Why are penuts banned from school?

Status
Not open for further replies.

ShadowSoldier

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2009
Messages
9,382
Trophies
0
XP
3,843
Country
Canada
This may come off as me sounding like a dick, but I don't get it.

Just because people are allergic to nuts, the rest of the people have to suffer? I mean, for me, when I was going to school, I didn't like having meat, I just had penut butter and jelly sandwiches. And now that nuts and everything is banned, I have to suffer for it because people are allergic?

The way I see it, just don't come around me when I'm eating my lunch. A lot of people are allergic to different things besides nuts, yet none of those got banned in school. So why should the rest of us have to suffer and change our diet and lunches just because some people are allergic? I really don't think it's fair.
 

Veho

The man who cried "Ni".
Former Staff
Joined
Apr 4, 2006
Messages
11,381
Trophies
3
Age
42
Location
Zagreb
XP
41,111
Country
Croatia
Because peanut allergies are violent and more dangerous than most other allergies.
 

BORTZ

DO NOT SCREENSHOT
Supervisor
Joined
Dec 2, 2007
Messages
13,243
Trophies
3
Age
34
Location
Pittsburgh
XP
15,986
Country
United States
I guess if there is someone you have a grudge against, and they happen to have a peanut allergy, you could also use that against them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people

ShadowSoldier

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2009
Messages
9,382
Trophies
0
XP
3,843
Country
Canada
Because peanut allergies are violent and more dangerous than most other allergies.

Ya but a lot of people only react to nuts when it either touches them or they come near it, like, 3 feet away. A person should have the right to eat nuts if they aren't allergic to it, just as long as they don't go near others that are.
 

Tom

Gbatemp's Unofficial Modder
Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
987
Trophies
0
Age
27
Location
New jersey
XP
456
Country
United States
SOme people have an allergy to peanuts if even the smell is inhaled? That's all I got
 

Veho

The man who cried "Ni".
Former Staff
Joined
Apr 4, 2006
Messages
11,381
Trophies
3
Age
42
Location
Zagreb
XP
41,111
Country
Croatia
Ya but a lot of people only react to nuts when it either touches them or they come near it, like, 3 feet away. A person should have the right to eat nuts if they aren't allergic to it, just as long as they don't go near others that are.
Schools just don't want a food fight to result in actual deaths.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9 people

ShadowSoldier

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2009
Messages
9,382
Trophies
0
XP
3,843
Country
Canada
Ya but a lot of people only react to nuts when it either touches them or they come near it, like, 3 feet away. A person should have the right to eat nuts if they aren't allergic to it, just as long as they don't go near others that are.
Schools just don't want a food fight to result in actual deaths.

What schools even have food fights these days?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person

Arras

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2010
Messages
6,318
Trophies
2
XP
5,407
Country
Netherlands
I always saw food fights as an urban myth. I sure as hell never had one in my entire schooling.
Yeah, same here. The worst I ever saw was three kids throwing their moldy bread at each other, which lasted for about 10 seconds.
 

Tom

Gbatemp's Unofficial Modder
Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
987
Trophies
0
Age
27
Location
New jersey
XP
456
Country
United States
Ya but a lot of people only react to nuts when it either touches them or they come near it, like, 3 feet away. A person should have the right to eat nuts if they aren't allergic to it, just as long as they don't go near others that are.
Schools just don't want a food fight to result in actual deaths.

What schools even have food fights these days?
MINE last year , Senior prank . Yes it was as awesome as one would think
 

jimmyemunoz

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
1,958
Trophies
0
Location
Louisiana
XP
487
Country
United States
What are penuts? LOL There are so many other things being forced on people today, like homosexuality for instance. People are being forced through laws, and minority peer pressure, to accept it. I guess these same people have now taken up a cause for penuts.
 

FAST6191

Techromancer
Editorial Team
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
36,798
Trophies
3
XP
28,321
Country
United Kingdom
I agree it sucks and would probably tell people to grow a pair but from a pure risk management standpoint it probably makes sense. Likewise although it is a somewhat violent reaction for some others can just be a matter of going blue in the corner and "community in shock as child dies 4 meters from oblivious teacher" (replace with capitals and/or add in straight A, big university scholarship sporting, sports team captain...... according to taste or lack of decency of chosen rag) is the sort of headline, despite being really ill informed, that grows legs.

On top of this some kids probably do not know better and will trade with people thus triggering things and the average minimum wage type that staffs a canteen is probably not best equipped to handle such a situation (if one of the more medically inclined 'tempers comes along I am sure they can relay a story of their first encounter with anaphylaxis or indeed stories of the first encounters of others- it is quite often a telling experience).

Edit- as for food fights. Schools not so much, parties (child and adult), weddings and funerals/wakes yes.
 

Gahars

Bakayaro Banzai
Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2011
Messages
10,255
Trophies
0
XP
14,723
Country
United States
This may come off as me sounding like a dick, but I don't get it.

Just because people are allergic to nuts, the rest of the people have to suffer? I mean, for me, when I was going to school, I didn't like having meat, I just had penut butter and jelly sandwiches. And now that nuts and everything is banned, I have to suffer for it because people are allergic?

The way I see it, just don't come around me when I'm eating my lunch. A lot of people are allergic to different things besides nuts, yet none of those got banned in school. So why should the rest of us have to suffer and change our diet and lunches just because some people are allergic? I really don't think it's fair.

...Because the allergy is very common, often sensitive, and life threatening?

Banning all peanut butter is extreme, sure, but the rationale is understandable. Plus, I love peanut butter as much as the next non-allergic guy, but are you really "suffering" from just having eat something else for lunch?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people

ShadowSoldier

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2009
Messages
9,382
Trophies
0
XP
3,843
Country
Canada
This may come off as me sounding like a dick, but I don't get it.

Just because people are allergic to nuts, the rest of the people have to suffer? I mean, for me, when I was going to school, I didn't like having meat, I just had penut butter and jelly sandwiches. And now that nuts and everything is banned, I have to suffer for it because people are allergic?

The way I see it, just don't come around me when I'm eating my lunch. A lot of people are allergic to different things besides nuts, yet none of those got banned in school. So why should the rest of us have to suffer and change our diet and lunches just because some people are allergic? I really don't think it's fair.

...Because the allergy is very common, often sensitive, and life threatening?

Banning all peanut butter is extreme, sure, but the rationale is understandable. Plus, I love peanut butter as much as the next non-allergic guy, but are you really "suffering" from just having eat something else for lunch?

Again, some kids (like my older brother and sister when they were in school), don't eat meat for sandwiches, they wanted penut butter and jelly. Not really a whole lot of other alternatives out there.
 

Gahars

Bakayaro Banzai
Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2011
Messages
10,255
Trophies
0
XP
14,723
Country
United States
This may come off as me sounding like a dick, but I don't get it.

Just because people are allergic to nuts, the rest of the people have to suffer? I mean, for me, when I was going to school, I didn't like having meat, I just had penut butter and jelly sandwiches. And now that nuts and everything is banned, I have to suffer for it because people are allergic?

The way I see it, just don't come around me when I'm eating my lunch. A lot of people are allergic to different things besides nuts, yet none of those got banned in school. So why should the rest of us have to suffer and change our diet and lunches just because some people are allergic? I really don't think it's fair.

...Because the allergy is very common, often sensitive, and life threatening?

Banning all peanut butter is extreme, sure, but the rationale is understandable. Plus, I love peanut butter as much as the next non-allergic guy, but are you really "suffering" from just having eat something else for lunch?

Again, some kids (like my older brother and sister when they were in school), don't eat meat for sandwiches, they wanted penut butter and jelly. Not really a whole lot of other alternatives out there.

Ask, and ye shall receive.

And I know that sucks, but (from the school's POV) what's the greater inconvenience: some kids have to find a replacement for their peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, or someone dies?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Status
Not open for further replies.

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2: Sak is a fishy pineapple