Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale Revealed

Originality

Chibi-neko
Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2008
Messages
5,716
Trophies
1
Age
35
Location
London, UK
Website
metalix.deviantart.com
XP
1,904
Country
I've seen it before and my response even back then was simply "Meh, it's no Smash Bros or Jump Ultimate Stars".
I totally want to see a Sony vs Nintendo game, just so I can see Kratos and Pit and their worlds fight it out. :lol:
Nintendo Smash Bros vs Sony All Stars? Now THAT would be a game worth paying $60 for!
Only... needs more Jump Ultimate Stars...
 

DanielJavierGuzz

Active Member
Newcomer
Joined
Feb 15, 2012
Messages
31
Trophies
0
XP
95
Here's a picture from the dev studio working on the game. Notice any Nintendo-related items in there?
1335546505955.jpg

Source http://www.gonintendo.com/?mode=viewstory&id=176332
 

Gahars

Bakayaro Banzai
Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2011
Messages
10,255
Trophies
0
XP
14,723
Country
United States
Looks fun enough, and it'll be interesting to see what other characters they can fit into the game. I'm sure this will be a smashing success for Sony.
 

Absurd

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Apr 13, 2007
Messages
57
Trophies
0
XP
126
Country
I just don't see the draw for these kind of games. They're not proper fighting games and have all the depth of a puddle yet people rave about them. They're almost as bad as the Tekken and Soul Calibur series: spend 2 years ''mastering'' the controls and moves only for a complete novice to twat the living snot out of you just by mashing random buttons. No skill, no satisfaction, no point in playing.

Still, some sucker will buy it. I dread to think how much DLC they've got planned for the fucker.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
D

Deleted User

Guest
I love how you guys are arguing when I'm going to be sitting back and playing Super Smash Bros. Sony. Just forget a game's a clone and you'll be amazed how good some games are. Of course, though, I still am kind of angry that Sony can't have any original ideas.


 

DDTarZan

Never getting laid again /s
Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2009
Messages
313
Trophies
1
Age
32
Location
In some trees
XP
1,855
Country
United States
Here's a picture from the dev studio working on the game. Notice any Nintendo-related items in there?
1335546505955.jpg

Source http://www.gonintend...story&id=176332

Even though a game should be viewed as just a game, this picture just does it it. Good for Sony for making what might becaome a decent game with a certain type of gameplay, but for unmistakably copying an already made game, that's just so fucking embarassing.
 

Guild McCommunist

(not on boat)
OP
Member
Joined
May 6, 2009
Messages
18,148
Trophies
0
Age
31
Location
The Danger Zone
XP
10,348
Country
United States
>Jump Super/Ultimate Stars blatantly rips off SSB, people praise it
>Sony blatantly rips off SSB, people bash it for ripping off SSB.

Knock up job there GBAtemp.

Looks like the best fighter for the PS3, still prefer brawl though.

I forgot about Tekken 6, SSFIV, UMvC3, whatever the latest BlazBlue is, and SFxT.

Also, implying this is a fighting game and not a brawler.

And let it be noted that, again, you can ONLY kill other players with the Level 3 AP Attack. No other time in the match can you kill opponents, only when you use your Level 3 meter attack.

From what I read you can kill a character with any level AP attack, it's just that the higher levels equate to higher damage or a larger AoE.

EDIT: After seeing the video this is obvious when you see PaRappa hit Fat Princess and Kratos when doing his skateboard attack and Sweet Tooth with his missile attack.

Also, am I the only one noticing combos or at least chain attacks?
 

Felipe_9595

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2010
Messages
370
Trophies
0
XP
631
Country
Cote d'Ivoire
why are people acting like nintendo invented fighting games (big shocker coming from here!)
They invented the casual 4 player party fighting genre.... which honestly any game that comes remotely near the genre is called a rip-off now. Don't really see why we don't call out more ripoffs such as futuristic space fps, or jumping platforms sidescroller ripoffs. Honestly though, most of these games that look like smash bros tend to suck badly or just be overshadowed by Smash, titles such as digimon rumble arena 1 and 2 or tmnt smash up they just don't have that stuff that makes you want to keep playing it over again and I just don't see how this is going to be different, that K.O. mechanic sounds more derpier than randomly tripping on smbb >.>
Read their article and stuff, so its going to be more balanced and have a "robust" online, I get the online but they are going for a competitive play on something that looks so casual.... Just as bad as smash bros players who think the game is meant for tournament play. At least it will show how online should have been done for brawl.
Brawl is not casual... :|

It is. Melee isnt :)

EDIT: Also, anyone implying Smash is not a fighting game is retarded.
 

Guild McCommunist

(not on boat)
OP
Member
Joined
May 6, 2009
Messages
18,148
Trophies
0
Age
31
Location
The Danger Zone
XP
10,348
Country
United States
It is. Melee isnt :)

EDIT: Also, anyone implying Smash is not a fighting game is retarded.

It's not. It's a multiplayer brawler.

There's no combos, horrible balance, and absolutely no mechanics that make it a fighting game outside of attacks. That's not to say the games aren't fun, I do like all of them (well the original SSB is shit nowadays, it hasn't aged well at all), but to say they're competitive fighters on the same level of Street Fighter, Tekken, etc? Absolutely not.
 

cris92x

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2008
Messages
419
Trophies
0
Age
32
XP
229
Country
United States
I think they are follow ups, anyway only reason Jump is praised is because its on the ds, it has so many characters from VERY popular animes, and did I mention its on the ds and has online? I'm not very enthusiastic about this game, maybe if they truly had memorable characters *cough* crash bandicoot and original spyro and not kratos and sweet tooth. The only way I see this
why are people acting like nintendo invented fighting games (big shocker coming from here!)
They invented the casual 4 player party fighting genre.... which honestly any game that comes remotely near the genre is called a rip-off now. Don't really see why we don't call out more ripoffs such as futuristic space fps, or jumping platforms sidescroller ripoffs. Honestly though, most of these games that look like smash bros tend to suck badly or just be overshadowed by Smash, titles such as digimon rumble arena 1 and 2 or tmnt smash up they just don't have that stuff that makes you want to keep playing it over again and I just don't see how this is going to be different, that K.O. mechanic sounds more derpier than randomly tripping on smbb >.>
Read their article and stuff, so its going to be more balanced and have a "robust" online, I get the online but they are going for a competitive play on something that looks so casual.... Just as bad as smash bros players who think the game is meant for tournament play. At least it will show how online should have been done for brawl.
Brawl is not casual... :|

It is. Melee isnt :)

EDIT: Also, anyone implying Smash is not a fighting game is retarded.
It is a fighting game, it is not a tournament or professional fighting game, its Casual. Just like how mario kart is a casual racing but when poeple play forza motorsport its worth playing competitively.
 

Felipe_9595

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2010
Messages
370
Trophies
0
XP
631
Country
Cote d'Ivoire
It is. Melee isnt :)

EDIT: Also, anyone implying Smash is not a fighting game is retarded.

It's not. It's a multiplayer brawler.

There's no combos, horrible balance, and absolutely no mechanics that make it a fighting game outside of attacks. That's not to say the games aren't fun, I do like all of them (well the original SSB is shit nowadays, it hasn't aged well at all), but to say they're competitive fighters on the same level of Street Fighter, Tekken, etc? Absolutely not.

BRAWl haves no combos, Lets look at melee:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYgopUL8kk8

And lets not mention SSB 64...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fvtf0kPmwtw

Melee is one of the most competitive games ever created and is still being played at tournaments, despite it being release 11 years ago:
 

Guild McCommunist

(not on boat)
OP
Member
Joined
May 6, 2009
Messages
18,148
Trophies
0
Age
31
Location
The Danger Zone
XP
10,348
Country
United States
I think they are follow ups, anyway only reason Jump is praised is because its on the ds, it has so many characters from VERY popular animes, and did I mention its on the ds and has online? I'm not very enthusiastic about this game, maybe if they truly had memorable characters *cough* crash bandicoot and original spyro and not kratos and sweet tooth.

Why can't this be praised because it's on the PS3, has so many characters from VERY popular franchises, and did I mention its on the PS3 and has online? If people liked Jump! because it was on a system that didn't have a proper SSB, why are people bashing this for the same exact reason?


This is pretty sad. From what I've seen on this forum Sony fans hate everything about Nintendo. So what does Sony do? They create a game thats exactly like a well known Nintendo game.

Sony fans hate everything about Nintendo, but yet all they want is Nintendo clones. Crash Nitro Kart, Move Controllers, Sony Smash Bros. It really makes the fanbase look foolish. Its like Sony is deliberately shitting on us all.

>Implying Crash Nitro Kart was made by Sony or published by Sony or that it was the first Crash racing game.

Also I dunno many "Sony fans" on this forum. Also fans are generally retarded so one fanbase hating something doesn't equate to a bad move from the company. Hardcore Sonic fans basically just want Sonic 1,2, or 3 and claim everything else bad. But not every Sonic game outside of 1, 2, and 3 is bad.
 

HamburgerBandit

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
54
Trophies
0
XP
11
Country
United States
This is pretty sad. From what I've seen on this forum Sony fans hate everything about Nintendo. So what does Sony do? They create a game thats exactly like a well known Nintendo game.

Sony fans hate everything about Nintendo, but yet all they want is Nintendo clones. Crash Nitro Kart, Move Controllers, Sony Smash Bros. It really makes the fanbase look foolish. Its like Sony is deliberately shitting on us all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person

[M]artin

.
Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2006
Messages
3,658
Trophies
0
Age
34
XP
995
Country
United States
>Jump Super/Ultimate Stars blatantly rips off SSB, people praise it
Well, I don't know about that. Jump had the whole Koma unlock/build system and customization going for it, it was one of the main gameplay mechanics that made it a unique fighter. People had many ways to customize each fighter to their liking with extra special abilities. That alone sets it apart from Smash, I think.

Sony Smash Bros most likely has a bunch more surprises in store but, damn, what a terrible debut.
 

Master Mo

F.R.E.E.
Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
2,181
Trophies
1
Age
36
Location
Man Mo Temple
XP
429
Country
Germany
It is a fighting game, it is not a tournament or professional fighting game, its Casual. Just like how mario kart is a casual racing but when poeple play forza motorsport its worth playing competitively.
I agree with SSB but not with MK!

Also this is obviously a rip-off but does anyone care... I think Sony-Fans will love to let their favourite characters have fights and imo if they have a rich roster and interesting mechanics why not give it a go!

The only thing that would bug me is if it would feel the same as SSB. Like control-wise, since I think that is way to unique to SSB and I think that wouldn`t be a smart move to copy something like a "control-feel".
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person

Felipe_9595

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2010
Messages
370
Trophies
0
XP
631
Country
Cote d'Ivoire
It is a fighting game, it is not a tournament or professional fighting game, its Casual. Just like how mario kart is a casual racing but when poeple play forza motorsport its worth playing competitively.
I agree with SSB but not with MK!

Also this is obviously a rip-off but does anyone care... I think Sony-Fans will love to let their favourite characters have fights and imo if they have a rich roster and interesting mechanics why not give it a go!

The only thing that would bug me is if it would feel the same as SSB. Like control-wise, since I think that is way to unique to SSB and I think that wouldn`t be a smart move to copy something like a "control-feel".

Did people ignore the post i made regarding competitive smash >_>
 

Guild McCommunist

(not on boat)
OP
Member
Joined
May 6, 2009
Messages
18,148
Trophies
0
Age
31
Location
The Danger Zone
XP
10,348
Country
United States
The only thing that would bug me is if it would feel the same as SSB. Like control-wise, since I think that is way to unique to SSB and I think that wouldn`t be a smart move to copy something like a "control-feel".

Well the controls don't seem identical. You have three dedicated attack buttons (where as SSB has only two) and the placement is different (jump in SSB was for the upper two X/Y buttons while here it appears to be mapped to X if I read the article right).

Otherwise, it's good to see a Nintendo fan here who isn't acting retarded here.

Did people ignore the post i made regarding competitive smash >_>

I did when you said it was the most competitive fighting game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • ZeroT21 @ ZeroT21:
    me doin' simple stuff
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Don't always need a bunch of electronics to enjoy electronics
    +1
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Issue is we want new and best then it piles up
  • ZeroT21 @ ZeroT21:
    i'm all gud if my browser don't lag
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    I fixed a 2010 netbook for someone and they were happy
  • ZeroT21 @ ZeroT21:
    i did something similar to for a friend, was a old acer netbook, he was over the moon, guess guys are just that simple
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Still had xp all the works at least got 7 on it
  • ZeroT21 @ ZeroT21:
    even if MS says newer windows works fine on 1 Gb of ram, I'd still go for the default or similar OS
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    It loaded youtube with like a 5 minute lag lol
  • ZeroT21 @ ZeroT21:
    it's a old potato, can't expect much
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    I told her it's not a good porn book
  • ZeroT21 @ ZeroT21:
    it's fine if it work and can watch their fav porn
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    For images maybe
  • ZeroT21 @ ZeroT21:
    it's not a vibrator la, ...that lags
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    No haptic feedback in laptops
  • ZeroT21 @ ZeroT21:
    you ain't paying for that kinda realism with this hardware
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Need to give apple $600
  • ZeroT21 @ ZeroT21:
    the more you give apple the more features they will take away
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Apple finally invented folders
  • ZeroT21 @ ZeroT21:
    i still want headphone jacks for my shit
  • ZeroT21 @ ZeroT21:
    i dont want do deal with low on battery earbuds and shit
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    I hate cords but my life is a cord will probably make a noose from cords
  • ZeroT21 @ ZeroT21:
    we'll all croak one day, no need to fuss so much
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    @K3Nv2, Use a Pi it can hack PS4 now too lol
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Until that day there is a need
    K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2: Until that day there is a need