Obama has the budget
Under control?
Under control? No. However, Obama's proposed budget slashes away at the deficit by allowing tax breaks for the rich to go away, among other things (trimming waste, etc). "Under control" would imply there not being a deficit at all. Unfortunately, both the debt and the deficit are massive, and that's going to take some time. Likewise, the US economy is still fragile, and history has shown us that shifting focus to deficit-reduction as opposed to stimulus spending can have negative consequences on the economy. So in summary, no, the debt problem is not yet under control, but the Obama budget is the only one that offers any real solutions that are projected to eventually get us to a place where they are under control. All of the major Republican candidates' budgets make the debt worse with more tax benefits for the rich.
My God is my God, I don't force others to my religion, I try to lead them there. (Though I haven't done a very good job as of late.)
Oil wars are not proper, and I am in favor of domestic oil, regardless of it "ruining the views" from our beaches or whatever crap logic rich folk have.
Tax breaks should be universal, not just for one class/race of people.
Social programs are not and should not be the federal government's domain.
The Bill of Rights is a necessary part of our Constitution.
I understand that not all people who identify as Republican are like that. However, as far as the Republican track record goes, the above summary of Republicans in office is now very accurate, especially with the candidates for President. The Republicans in office have moved very far to the right; arguably, there are no moderate Republicans left. I agree that domestic oil is better than foreign oil, but you have to admit that there are numerous environmental issues involved with oil-drilling, and considering the fact that oil is not a renewable resource, investment in alternative forms of energy that are both renewable and better for the environment is logical. As for taxes, they should be fair for everyone. This is why the Obama budget proposes keeping the Bush tax cuts for the lower and middle classes but letting the tax cuts expire for the rich. I disagree with you about the role of the federal government in social programs. Are you arguing that things like social security and medicare should be destroyed?
And I don't think anyone is arguing against the Bill of Rights.
Edit:
@Lacius Don't just blame it on one side, remember who's had the power in congress the last 50 years? It was not republicans, it was democrats. Why can't everyone own up and say "hell, he's right for once, maybe we did go a little power crazy and spend just a little too much." How hard would that be? Small "and large" business has always been the scapegoat, ever since the great depression, how has this worked out I wonder? Same effect...
I'm not exactly sure what you're getting at. I've noted the facts about the Democrats' effect on the economy and the debt, and the Republicans' effect on the economy and the debt in recent times, and the facts are quite clear.
Because I've said this numerous times already, I'll keep this short. After Clinton, we were on the road to erasing our debt completely. Bush enacted major tax cuts, increased military spending (Iraq, Afghanistan), and all without paying for any of it. These things are the largest contributors to the deficit even today. Obama's increased spending is minimal in comparison, and it was mostly economic recovery. It is quite obvious that the blame falls on the Republicans, and the Republican presidential candidates don't appear very eager to redeem themselves, considering that they want to make the debt problem worse.