Thats why, i would love the Atheistic Counterpart, I would even download it.
First off, it's Atheist, not Atheistic. Second, there isn't an Atheist Bible...If I have to explain why, you clearly don't know what Atheism is. Please go troll elsewhere...
To be fair, Atheistic is correct in that context. "Atheist" is a noun, "Atheistic" is the adjective, making it's usage correct.
And actually, I did read a while ago about some book (I think they called it "The Good Book") that was the "Atheist Bible", it was basically a collection of "wisdom" (note the inverted commas there) and quotes from various people over time, basically aiming to in a sense "recreate" the Bible, but without God. And this from the people who claim to have no religion. But in my experience, atheists are deeply religious - their religion is "anti-religion". They are so enthusiastically opposed to "religion", that it actually becomes a religion for them. Therefore, I strongly believe that Atheism
is a religion.
You're thinking more of Agnosticism, which is the people who don't actually believe in anything/don't care.
However, the other guy also said something about not being religious (or as he said, not being "religions") - if he classifies himself as an Atheist, as he seems to, he is wrong on that point. And he also seems unable to type too well, justifying your "troll" comment.