Russia directed arson attacks against UK's Prime Minister, along with false-flag operations to benefit real and fake far-right groups

[AmeliaFox]

Until "you" actually provide a source, none of it is as you claim it to be. This same song and dance has been done by trolls and for years. Make up a claim without a source, and watch as everyone else scurries about trying to find evidence of it, allowing you to simply say they are wrong so long as it doesn't work in your favor.

Yet you believe the made up bullshit story from the BBC....... I guess that fits your world view better so no need to question the ridiculousness of it or the motives behind it.

Personally I believe Starmer hired some Ukrainian rent boys (recommended by his corrupt criminal coke sniffing "friend" Zelensky), never paid them for services rendered and one of the rent boys roped his mates into some whacky revenge scheme and then got caught. So he made up (or was forced to tell) some bullshit story under duress, then the BBC thought - how can we blame Putin for this and spin the narrative so Russia gets the blame instead of the Ukrainian rent boys that actually commited the crimes.

 

[Dark_Ansem]

L M A O Deform nonsense and AI slop

 

[DiscostewSM]

Yet you believe the made up bullshit story from the BBC....... I guess that fits your world view better so no need to question the ridiculousness of it or the motives behind it.

Personally I believe Starmer hired some Ukrainian rent boys (recommended by his corrupt criminal coke sniffing "friend" Zelensky), never paid them for services rendered and one of the rent boys roped his mates into some whacky revenge scheme and then got caught. So he made up (or was forced to tell) some bullshit story under duress, then the BBC thought - how can we blame Putin for this and spin the narrative so Russia gets the blame instead of the Ukrainian rent boys that actually commited the crimes.

You still haven't sourced your claim, so all you're doing is crying that no one believes your 'trust me, bro' claim.

 

[SeltzerMist]

Yet you believe the made up bullshit story from the BBC....... I guess that fits your world view better so no need to question the ridiculousness of it or the motives behind it.

Personally I believe Starmer hired some Ukrainian rent boys (recommended by his corrupt criminal coke sniffing "friend" Zelensky), never paid them for services rendered and one of the rent boys roped his mates into some whacky revenge scheme and then got caught. So he made up (or was forced to tell) some bullshit story under duress, then the BBC thought - how can we blame Putin for this and spin the narrative so Russia gets the blame instead of the Ukrainian rent boys that actually commited the crimes.

Where the fuck are your sources Shyguy

 

[Sir Tortoise]

So you found a single link about something on the internet written by some random person and assumed that was "The Source". You have the same skills as the BBC "reporters" have. Maybe you should apply for a job at the BBC. I just had a look at your posting history and most of your posts are spent in this section, which seems weird considering this is a gaming forum. Some would think you have an agenda to push in the same way as the BBC reporters that found 3 Ukrainian rent boys were working for Russia via some underground website with a user (they didn't know) going by some initials that just happened to have the same initials as some Russian guy does - who promised to pay them in crypto for setting some fires (because that sounds logical). Maybe the BBC know things the Police don't....or maybe they just made that shit up, because that's how propaganda is done.

I read this entire thing hoping the source would be here, but you forgot to prove me wrong. Can you enlighten me? I have one link to a well known newspaper, you have zero. Why are you looking through my profile as if you care more about me than the truth?

You don't actually know or care where the claim comes from, do you?

Also, if you want to pretend to be disinterested in politics or not have an "agenda" (whatever that means) - change your profile picture.

 

[titan_tim]

Personally I believe .....

Hmmmm.... who to believe? The BBC who have actual investigators and evidence for their statements, or believe the feelings of some guy who slurps Putin's taint.

I don't know much about the situation in the UK, but I know who I'd trust.

 

[AmeliaFox]

Why are you looking through my profile as if you care more about me than the truth?

I look at some people's previous posts to see what kind of stuff they come out with and then judge if they are biased or are pretty moronic braindead types. I generally ignore those people as it's pointless giving them any oxygen. I saw nearly all you posts are in this section which is very strange since this is a gaming forum. So I think you are more into politics (or arguing with people) rather than gaming. I thought you might be able to spot propaganda when you're being spoonfed it from a left wing media organisation with a history of biased writers and a history of anti Russian tripe. I guess not, you'll believe anything that's been written if it comes from a media company you want to agree with, no matter how far fetched the story you read is.

 

[SeltzerMist]

I look at some people's previous posts to see what kind of stuff they come out with and then judge if they are biased or are pretty moronic braindead types. I generally ignore those people as it's pointless giving them any oxygen. I saw nearly all you posts are in this section which is very strange since this is a gaming forum. So I think you are more into politics (or arguing with people) rather than gaming. I thought you might be able to spot propaganda when you're being spoonfed it from a left wing media organisation with a history of biased writers and a history of anti Russian tripe. I guess not, you'll believe anything that's been written if it comes from a media company you want to agree with, no matter how far fetched the story you read is.

Where are your fucking sources Shy guy?

 

[Sir Tortoise]

I look at some people's previous posts to see what kind of stuff they come out with and then judge if they are biased or are pretty moronic braindead types. I generally ignore those people as it's pointless giving them any oxygen. I saw nearly all you posts are in this section which is very strange since this is a gaming forum. So I think you are more into politics (or arguing with people) rather than gaming. I thought you might be able to spot propaganda when you're being spoonfed it from a left wing media organisation with a history of biased writers and a history of anti Russian tripe. I guess not, you'll believe anything that's been written if it comes from a media company you want to agree with, no matter how far fetched the story you read is.

Yep, I am very into arguing! Thanks for noticing.

Any response to the rest of my post that you removed from your quote? How can you talk about spotting propaganda when you don't even know where your claim came from?

 

[SeltzerMist]

Yep, I am very into arguing! Thanks for noticing.

Any response to the rest of my post that you removed from your quote? How can you talk about spotting propaganda when you don't even know where your claim came from?

Cause they're the one who fell for propaganda and happen to be the moronic brain dead individual they're attempting to project on us here.

 

[AmeliaFox]

Yep, I am very into arguing! Thanks for noticing.

Any response to the rest of my post that you removed from your quote? How can you talk about spotting propaganda when you don't even know where your claim came from?

So what you're saying is that you believe this:

1: Three Ukrainian rentboys all just happened to be be browsing on some underground Telegram channel.
2: Some user going by the username "EL" that they didn't know promised to pay them in crypto for doing a job for them.
3: They accepted the job - no questions asked and agreed to get paid once the job was done. (yeah obviously)
4: They had never heard of queer Keir Starmer (but knew where his properties and ex properties were).
5: The BBC knew who this "El" person was (but the police didn't), because that user has the same initails as some Russian guy.
6: The presumed "Russian" that the BBC identified due to having the same initials as someone else, was taking orders from Putin - because the BBC said so.

Hmmmm, now here's the thing. If Putin wanted to send a message to Starmer, he would just phone him up and tell him he's a bellend. He wouldn't be contacting people in underground telegram channels to recruit rent boys to set fires. Even a half witted moron can see that story is complete bollocks, thought up by some fantasist.

Far more believable is that Starmer has a fettish for eastern european rent boys and cocaine, didn't want to pay them for "services rendered", they got angry so found out where some of his properties and ex-properties were and set some fires in the hope he would get scared and cough up the cash he owed them.

 

[SeltzerMist]

So what you're saying is that you believe this:

1: Three Ukrainian rentboys all just happened to be be browsing on some underground Telegram channel.
2: Some user going by the username "EL" that they didn't know promised to pay them in crypto for doing a job for them.
3: They accepted the job - no questions asked and agreed to get paid once the job was done. (yeah obviously)
4: They had never heard of queer Keir Starmer (but knew where his properties and ex properties were).
5: The BBC knew who this "El" person was (but the police didn't), because that user has the same initails as some Russian guy.
6: The presumed "Russian" that the BBC identified due to having the same initials as someone else, was taking orders from Putin - because the BBC said so.

Hmmmm, now here's the thing. If Putin wanted to send a message to Starmer, he would just phone him up and tell him he's a bellend. He wouldn't be contacting people in underground telegram channels to recruit rent boys to set fires. Even a half witted moron can see that story is complete bollocks, thought up by some fantasist.

Far more believable is that Starmer has a fettish for eastern european rent boys and cocaine, didn't want to pay them for "services rendered", they got angry so found out where some of his properties and ex-properties were and set some fires in the hope he would get scared and cough up the cash he owed them.

Enough with the tinfoil shit Shyguy, get a life.

 

[DiscostewSM]

I read this entire thing hoping the source would be here, but you forgot to prove me wrong. Can you enlighten me? I have one link to a well known newspaper, you have zero. Why are you looking through my profile as if you care more about me than the truth?

You don't actually know or care where the claim comes from, do you?

Also, if you want to pretend to be disinterested in politics or not have an "agenda" (whatever that means) - change your profile picture.

What is ironic is how they tried to use the whole "random person online" bit to combat your investigations as if that didn't completely destroy their own stance, as they are a far more random person online than the one you linked. We are all just random people on this website, but the difference between us and them is that we actually look into these things and provide the sources of what we looked at so others can look into it themselves, rather than just going by "trust me, bro".

 

[SeltzerMist]

What is ironic is how they tried to use the whole "random person online" bit to combat your investigations as if that didn't completely destroy their own stance, as they are a far more random person online than the one you linked. We are all just random people on this website, but the difference between us and them is that we actually look into these things and provide the sources of what we looked at so others can look into it themselves, rather than just going by "trust me, bro".

It's a propaganda op, against the rules outlined in a pinned thread. I recommend reporting the profile.

 

[Sir Tortoise]

So what you're saying is that you believe this:

1: Three Ukrainian rentboys all just happened to be be browsing on some underground Telegram channel.
2: Some user going by the username "EL" that they didn't know promised to pay them in crypto for doing a job for them.
3: They accepted the job - no questions asked and agreed to get paid once the job was done. (yeah obviously)
4: They had never heard of queer Keir Starmer (but knew where his properties and ex properties were).
5: The BBC knew who this "El" person was (but the police didn't), because that user has the same initails as some Russian guy.
6: The presumed "Russian" that the BBC identified due to having the same initials as someone else, was taking orders from Putin - because the BBC said so.

Hmmmm, now here's the thing. If Putin wanted to send a message to Starmer, he would just phone him up and tell him he's a bellend. He wouldn't be contacting people in underground telegram channels to recruit rent boys to set fires. Even a half witted moron can see that story is complete bollocks, thought up by some fantasist.

Far more believable is that Starmer has a fettish for eastern european rent boys and cocaine, didn't want to pay them for "services rendered", they got angry so found out where some of his properties and ex-properties were and set some fires in the hope he would get scared and cough up the cash he owed them.

What convinced you they are "rent boys"? This is like the 5th time you've dodged the question.

 

[Dark_Ansem]

What convinced you they are "rent boys"?

Projection

 

[AmeliaFox]

What convinced you they are "rent boys"? This is like the 5th time you've dodged the question.

Previous reports I've seen on the internet, however why do i need to prove anything to anyone? Why doesn't the BBC come under the same scrutiny? You believe the crap they have come up with, not only that but reading threads you've previously been involved in you seem to believe lots of far out crap without any proof.

My story is far more likely than the BBC's fictional story.

 

[SeltzerMist]

Previous reports I've seen on the internet, however why do i need to prove anything to anyone? Why doesn't tyhe BBC come under the same scrutiny? You believe the crap they have come up with, not only that but reading threads you've previously been involved in you seem to believe lots of far out crap without any proof.

My story is far more likely than the BBC's fictional story.

"Why do I need to prove that the Earth is flat?"

That's intellectually, where you've landed.

Like why do you think a reasonable person would just take the word of some fascist incel?

 

[Dark_Ansem]

Reports L O L