It was free here in EuropeI still remember big brain academy for modding Wii U lol I wonder how many of that game sold.
It was free here in EuropeI still remember big brain academy for modding Wii U lol I wonder how many of that game sold.
I'm surprised to see this sentiment in here, unless you're against the fact that I pirated DS games.You need to get a clue dude![]()
In the first 2 years of having the Nintendo DS I cared very little for it, because I only played the most advertized first party games. I also dislike the GBA because I never paid for, or played any of the really deep and awesome games it had. So I went from GBA to DS back in the day thinking "what a waste of time the GBA was. The Mario games weren't that good.""why doesnt the company concede that the best thing about their devices is when there's no security and people don't have to pay for games anymore" are you hearing yourself
My favorite games on the DS were the ones the fewest people actually bought, and I don't blame them because I didn't either. You had to play them to "get" why they had a certain quality, and that's a barrier that plagues the industry and almost complete lack of diversity of game genres at this point.
But they should still realize that 60% of the Nintendo Goodwill comes from the fact that many people got to play a ton of their games other than just the Marios and Zeldas for absolutely no money, and this is why Nintendo has felt extremely generous and retentive for fans as opposed to Xbox and PlayStation, which as well as they do (or just PlayStation) is not exactly a Nintendo level of momentum.@linkenski I think your original post and follow up post sort of contradict one another hence the rash responses to your OP. I think your follow up post leans more towards what you originally intended. Smaller studios received more recognition due to piracy as it helped promote their works via word of mouth, message boards etc. In turn these same studios will shutter due to the pricing barrier and not offering a better "try before you buy" system locking potential fans from accessing these gems; further decreasing the third party pool of games/studios available for the system - reducing the amount of potential Switch 2 owners due to lack of games restarting the cycle of destruction. The snake eating its own tale.
Understandably so, but Nintendo will always be a company chasing profits and Nintendo, specifically, is a game company where their first party games & mascots drive the demand for the console. If you widen your scope from these smaller titles and look at just the sales numbers you'll see Nintendo has its shtick and always did what works for them. Also, just because you didn't believe the GBA Mario's were good does not mean they didn't sell. Keep in mind there are 10 Fast & the Furious movies.
The quote above is pretty self defining/explanatory, how could Nintendo be solely held accountable for something that plagues the industry as a whole. I think the bigger problem is the giant game studios gobbling up smaller successful studios strictly for their IP's just to shutter them afterwards; cough cough Microsoft.
60% of thier good will comes from how consistent their quality is with their games (namely the lack of bugs compared to many of the other game devs) and that they've been around for many, many years now. the rest of it comes down to the fact that the typical consumer doesn't give a shit what the perpetually angry mob says about what them no matter how many headlines they treat as the next thing that will totally bring them to thier knees.But they should still realize that 60% of the Nintendo Goodwill comes from the fact that many people got to play a ton of their games other than just the Marios and Zeldas for absolutely no money, and this is why Nintendo has felt extremely generous and retentive for fans as opposed to Xbox and PlayStation, which as well as they do (or just PlayStation) is not exactly a Nintendo level of momentum.
You literally have all of Thanos' Infinity Stones.I recommend Steam Deck, Ayn Odin, Retroid Pocket... I have them all
My nephews on the other hand have PS4 and Nintendo Switch.
If valve ever makes a smaller non-shitty-x86 architecture steamdeck2, the switch2 have dôme serious competitionYou literally have all of Thanos' Infinity Stones.
However, as a Steam Deck owner who recently modded a Nintendo Switch Lite, I can say I've been waiting for a Switch to play exclusives because the deck emulates it 10x better than the original hardware. I think the Switch is a bit more portable and better for playing Nintendo games on.
However, I won't deny that the sheer freedom of the Steam Deck is one of its strongest points and the reason I LOVE it.
Personally, I didn't buy a Switch 2 at launch and I don't think I'll want to do so in the short term, but the situation would change a lot for a hypothetical Steam Deck 2, given the technological evolution, the power, and the fact that it can run everything without modding anything.
But Steam Deck as it was designed must be x86, I understand the potential of ARM but imagine trying to make PC titles compatible with ARM, there are already games that give problems being translated to Vulkan and being launched with Proton, imagine on another architectureIf valve ever makes a smaller non-shitty-x86 architecture steamdeck2, the switch2 have dôme serious competition
I didn't intend something more in the post just because it's the one part you find acceptable to your own moral persuasions.@linkenski I think your original post and follow up post sort of contradict one another hence the rash responses to your OP. I think your follow up post leans more towards what you originally intended. Smaller studios received more recognition due to piracy as it helped promote their works via word of mouth, message boards etc. In turn these same studios will shutter due to the pricing barrier and not offering a better "try before you buy" system locking potential fans from accessing these gems; further decreasing the third party pool of games/studios available for the system - reducing the amount of potential Switch 2 owners due to lack of games restarting the cycle of destruction. The snake eating its own tale.
Understandably so, but Nintendo will always be a company chasing profits and Nintendo, specifically, is a game company where their first party games & mascots drive the demand for the console. If you widen your scope from these smaller titles and look at just the sales numbers you'll see Nintendo has its shtick and always did what works for them. Also, just because you didn't believe the GBA Mario's were good does not mean they didn't sell. Keep in mind there are 10 Fast & the Furious movies.
The quote above is pretty self defining/explanatory, how could Nintendo be solely held accountable for something that plagues the industry as a whole. I think the bigger problem is the giant game studios gobbling up smaller successful studios strictly for their IP's just to shutter them afterwards; cough cough Microsoft.


We've come to expect that most nintendo consoles be hacked one way or another, but that expectation wasn't because nintendo systems previously sucked at security(yeah, they sucked). It's because each nintendo console wasn't like other consoles in that they had unique traits. But then most people hacking their consoles also end up pirating the games that draw many to. Those kick ass games that you understandably didn't buy a switch to play on. Gaming has evolved, and the more mainstream appeal to gaming requires more secure systems and more powerful systems. Those little games you loved so much during the gba and ds era, because devs had to be creative in developing their games for a smaller system, are being handled by indie studios. And those games can be played on pc and other consoles. You are going to buy a switch because of the exclusives. Anything that comes after that is simply convenience of not having to play sitting down in front of a pc.I didn't intend something more in the post just because it's the one part you find acceptable to your own moral persuasions.
I generally and simply mean that part of buying a Nintendo console is also the prospect of modding it after a couple of years. That is part of what makes you BUY a Nintendo console. I liked the Nintendo DS better when I got access to homebrew on it. I went from using it very very little even with great games on it, to using it a shit-ton. That's my point. And Nintendo should recognize that a lot of Switch 1 users ended up gathering dust on their hardware since 2020 and onwards. Of course they can ignore that since their business and momentum is fine, but you also have to remember that Switch 1 did get modded after a while, and piracy aside, it gave a lot of reasons to check out the aging hardware again.
I simply think that being able to eventually jailbreak a Nintendo console is kind of a ritual that made DS, 3DS, Wii, Wii U and Switch 1 superior to me over the competition. I know you could also jailbreak PS4, but for me there's more of a culture around Nintendo modding and homebrew. They also had some of the best emulators and fan-projects, and I think Nintendo will ultimately face a reckoning some-day that while their business is booming, they've become the new EA in the face of most gamers. Already now with Switch 2 you're getting the sense that some good-will is turning against them over previous lawsuits taking 30% salary against the primary Switch 1 hacker for life, and Switch 2 already threatens you out of the gate with bricking itself if you happen to come into contact with anything unauthorized.
I really do think it leads somewhere eventually where Nintendo will have to face that a huge part of the goodwill their community had was because Nintendo had yes, kickass first party games, but they also had a community of nerds that make Mario say funny things in homemade animation and people making PlayStation games run on their consoles, and also yes, people checking out all the games they didn't buy.
Also, are we really in a place now where it's become immoral to be against monopolization? Are you all just shills in here?

2-3 years can also be a softmod, you know if someone notices something, they need to try not to show it off till a couple of firmware updates occur and see if it never gets blocked.My realistic predictions are 2-3 years for a modchip and over a decade for a softmod.

1. You sound lame that you let other people influence how you feel about games. That's all.The Nintendo DS was kind of boring to me, until the Datel, MaxConsole something chip released. I inserted the bulky shit in the GBA slot and played games with minor glitches using my cartridge's save types as donor carts. Later we got the R4, and I became a Nintendo DS fanboy.
Seriously, I can't stress how much more I liked my Nintendo consoles after I got to brew them. Switch 1 hasn't been the same, and I blame 2 things for it.
Back in 2010 it was still useful to be able to use MoonShine Player on DS to listen to music or read manga on it. The form factor, a touch screen and the Dual Screens also made homebrew software genuinely creative and fun to check out. Ditto with 3DS and the 3D effect.
- It became infested with "Gamer Pirates" bragging about playing XCIs on emulator before they even came out.
- Smart devices and Deck have removed a lot of the novelty of having an underpowered handheld that can run custom software.
But a Switch? Not so much. At the end of the day it is just an underpowered tablet with a bitchy hardware architecture. It's conventional and boring to design for.
And for that matter I'm also a bit eh on the Switch 2. But based on how good the scene used to be it is definitely depressing to see Nintendo treat pirates and brewers like first rate criminals.
Said the guy who made an account just to posted this.You sound lame