

From the article I copied it from. I didn't insert my own link. Here, since your google foo seems to be hampered: https://www.newsnationnow.com/us-news/immigration/kilmar-abrego-garcias-tattoos-ms-13/
You could have, you know, copied the quote and pasted it into Google...
The link came from the article. Literally the bottom line of the article is the quote I copied and pasted (link included). Try to keep up.That's a different article than the one from your previous post. It's on you to back up your nonsense claims.

The mother and father couldn't arrange anything because ICE cut the line the minute one of them spoke about getting a lawyer, to figure out how to keep the kid with the father/arrange shit...And in other news... everywhere... People are saying that Trump is deporting 2 year old children. Another outright lie. They deported the mother, and THE MOTHERS signed documents requesting to take the children with them. The children born here are citizens and can return if they choose to later in life. Shit like this is why I don't believe a single thing from ABC, CNN, etc...

What you said after this is essentially explaining how he's doing exactly what you claim he's not doing.And in other news... everywhere... People are saying that Trump is deporting 2 year old children. Another outright lie.

The link came from the article. Literally the bottom line of the article is the quote I copied and pasted (link included). Try to keep up.![]()
1) You could have easily looked that up yourself.
2) Reconcile what? Funny how of all the people saying the photo is fake... his wife hasn't publicly said so?
"The officers spoke with confidential informants who said Abrego Garcia is an active member of the gang’s Westerns clique."
It's YOUR news sources that makes shit up.
See the news everyone is running with, about his (lack of) popularity after 100 days? Complete bullshit. They either made it up outright, or called the same idiots who swore he would NEVER win the 2018 electionThe vocal minority, doesn't win, no matter how loud you are. The actual vote count, not some bullshit poll, says you're the minority.
From the article I copied it from. I didn't insert my own link. Here, since your google foo seems to be hampered: https://www.newsnationnow.com/us-news/immigration/kilmar-abrego-garcias-tattoos-ms-13/
You could have, you know, copied the quote and pasted it into Google...
Post automatically merged:
lol... asking to prove that a pic is photoshopped... is asking to prove a negative? You're right. Whole new level of stupid.
If it was "forcefully removed" then it was "forcefully removed" by the mother. Get a grip.What you said after this is essentially explaining how he's doing exactly what you claim he's not doing.
If the end result is a 2 year-old citizen is forcefully removed from the country, I think that's enough to justify the outrage, and that's clearly what's happening here even if it's the effect of this child's parents being removed from the country. The child is still a US citizen being effectively deported without due process, and it's bad enough that the parents are being deported without due process anyway.
web pages tend to dynamically assign links to key words each time you load them. Get an education. I don't even know what your point is, even if 10,000 web pages use the same exact quote, all 10,000 prove my point. I'm not making it up on my own, and you're just being difficult because orange man bad, and he likes orange man, so he bad...Except it literally isn't. Your two messages in question:
The hyperlink under "Abrego Garcia" in the first quote leads to https://www.newsnationnow.com/us-ne...brego-garcia-wife-protective-order-statement/
The link in the second post leads to https://www.newsnationnow.com/us-news/immigration/kilmar-abrego-garcias-tattoos-ms-13/
You can just look at the URL. Those are not the same links. Cut the crap.


BZZZZZZT wrong answer. -10 points.If it was "forcefully removed" then it was "forcefully removed" by the mother. Get a grip.
What don't you get, about the Mother taking the child with her? -10 IQ points for reading your idiotic bullshit, is what I Am... Nobody is forcefully removing children.BZZZZZZT wrong answer. -10 points.
This child is a US citizen and you ignored the fact that this is happening without due process, something you futily tried to downplay once already.
Neither the parents nor the child should be deported without due process, as I said, but even you should agree that US CITIZENS especially should not be removed from the country against their will...
Or are we doing the fascist thing here?

What don't you get, about the Mother taking the child with her? -10 IQ points for reading your idiotic bullshit, is what I Am... Nobody is forcefully removing children.
As if every single thing you post isn't a left wing tabloidGuy really posted a right wing tabloid as their source lmao
It's "unrightfully" when the mother decides to take the child with her? You're truly an idiot. The due process is the court date given when they illegally cross the border. It's on them if they decide not to show. My mother was an immigrant. Now a naturalized citizen. Did things right, and by the law. These asshats get no sympathy from me. Having babies here doesn't excuse them. Taking their children with them doesn't mean the government is deporting the children. You'd scream about it if they kept the children here, when the mother begged to take them with.The child (A US CITIZEN) is being unrightfully removed from the country. No crime, no due process. You somehow still don't see the problem? I agree that the child should be with parents, but that leads back to my point that the parents are being subject to the SAME UNLAWFUL REMOVAL. Do I need to make this any more clear? The US Constitution does not only apply when you like the things it does, and does not only apply to who you would like for it to.
Edit: Hilarious that you think I care what Marco Rubio thinks. That man is a whole ass clown. NY Post is the circus, too.
Please read the fourth amendment of the US Constitution now. Summary: https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-4/

??? Why are we just making things up now? You're not magically given a court summons when you hop the border. What are you even talking about?The due process is the court date given when they illegally cross the border.
Prove this claim.As if every single thing you post isn't a left wing tabloid
That's all he's been doing this whole time. It's either he's making stuff up (like the left wing tabloid remark) or he believes misinformation to be true. Neither outcome paint him in a particularly good light because he's either a liar or dumb. Or both.??? Why are we just making things up now? You're not magically given a court summons when you hop the border. What are you even talking about?

Remember folks...
"They're eating the dogs. They're eating the cats!"
"China will pay the tariffs!"
"He had MS-13 tattoo on his hand!"
If they say it, then it must be true!

web pages tend to dynamically assign links to key words each time you load them. Get an education. I don't even know what your point is, even if 10,000 web pages use the same exact quote, all 10,000 prove my point. I'm not making it up on my own, and you're just being difficult because orange man bad, and he likes orange man, so he bad...



