[Unconfirmed] ARM11 Kernel Vulnerability under 10.0.0-X

Status
Not open for further replies.

Deleted member 370671

Ball of Kawaiiness
Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2015
Messages
1,435
Trophies
1
Location
Lowee
XP
1,601
Country
Korea, North
So there's no exploit or vulnerability?
9.9 arm11 kernel vulnerability is dead for now?
No, there is no (public) kernel exploit for 9.3+ right now.
Yes, there is a vulnerability ; it is useless (or it seems like it for now at least), but it's still a vulnerability.
Finally, there is no ARM11 (public) kernel exploit at the moment, but it isn't "dead". I'm fairly sure there is one (even an ARM9), we just don't know what it is yet.
 

173210

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2014
Messages
245
Trophies
0
Age
26
Location
Japan
Website
173210.github.io
XP
683
Country
If you mean your first post's experiments then no they don't...
Update on 3dbrew.org
The previous version also allowed large negative s32_processorid values(negative processorid values are special values not actual procids), but it appears using values like that won't actually do anything(meaning no crash) besides the thread not running / thread not running for a while(besides triggering a kernelpanic with certain s32_processorid value(s)).
According to 3dbrew.org, s32_processorid should be larger than -4, which is the code-reversed value of the number of n3ds core.
So I carried out another experiment. It crashed when it took -4 as processorid on n3ds. So it may write the data in the same place as it does when it took 4 as processorid. It's still not clear whether it's exploitable or not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tony_93
Status
Not open for further replies.

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

eof

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    DinohScene @ DinohScene: ahh nothing beats a coffee disaronno at work