[Unconfirmed] ARM11 Kernel Vulnerability under 10.0.0-X

[173210]

Several trustworthy persons already stated that it isn't useful. I believe 3DBrew was already updated to mention this fact as well.

Yes, they won't lie. But they have not mentioned some possibilities (at first negative values, now negative values which is not too small ). I'm investigating them.

 

[teampleb]

Yes, they won't lie. But they have not mentioned some possibilities (at first negative values, now negative values which is not too small ). I'm investigating them.

You really shouldn't make a thread until you at least have something. Anything...

 

[lemanuel]

Yes, they won't lie. But they have not mentioned some possibilities (at first negative values, now negative values which is not too small ). I'm investigating them.

Quoting from 3DBrew:

The previous version also allowed large negative s32_processorid values(negative processorid values are special values not actual procids), but it appears using values like that won't actually do anything(meaning no crash) besides the thread not running / thread not running for a while(besides triggering a kernelpanic with certain s32_processorid value(s)).

I believe it's already stated about large negative values too (as you said "not too small"). So am I wrong to assume that it's already been said it's not useful?

 

[The Catboy]

I don't want to say "I told you so," but I did mention way back in the first 10.0.0-x thread that when Nintendo starts shooting out random updates, one after another, they are up to something. Nintendo only starts shooting out small updates like that without fixing the current exploits, when they know there's something bigger to patch.

 

[teampleb]

I don't want to say "I told you so," but I did mention way back in the first 10.0.0-x thread that when Nintendo starts shooting out random updates, one after another, they are up to something. Nintendo only starts shooting out small updates like that without fixing the current exploits, when they know there's something bigger to patch.

But we know what they patched...

 

[JuanmaHL]

2fake4me

 

[Nollog]

2fake4me

It's not about being fake, it's about numbers being excited and making threads on things before she has done anything with it.

 

[The Catboy]

But we know what they patched...

I never trust small updates that leave homebrews alone, there's always a catch.

 

[ric.]

Yes, they won't lie. But they have not mentioned some possibilities (at first negative values, now negative values which is not too small ). I'm investigating them.

Well hopefully you can find something! It wouldn't hurt to take a deeper look at it.

You really shouldn't make a thread until you at least have something. Anything...

To be fair the title of the thread was perfectly correct. I'd normally agree with you if it was something like "3DS ARM11 KEXPLOIT ON 10.0 AND UNDER BIG RELEASE GET IT WHILE ITS HOT", but it's really not 173210's fault. He shared his discovery with us, I think it's more our fault for getting all hyped up over what seems to be just a regular system flaw.

 

[DutchyDutch]

So... should I be hyped? Or isn't there anything to be hyped about? (9.9 user)

 

[BringusStudios]

So... should I be hyped? Or isn't there anything to be hyped about? (9.9 user)

Literally nothing to be hyped about

 

[bakurage]

Soooooo ... NEEEEEEEEEEEEED

 

[Deleted User]

This is not related to this specific exploit, but about a research i'm doing that can lead to the same results.
So, i need help and have a fcram dump from a old3ds firmware 10.1.
This can be easily achieved with an emunand and a cfw i guess, maybe rxtools.

 

[bakurage]

This vulnerabilty is exploitable for downgrade to 9.9 at 9.2 ?

 

[DutchyDutch]

Literally nothing to be hyped about

Great. Now if you excuse me, I'm gonna go cry in a corner.

 

[Bubsy Bobcat]

Whoop. Can't wait to join the glorious 9.2 master race.

 

[bakurage]

Whoop. Can't wait to join the glorious 9.2 master race.

o/

 

[Ekaitz]

I hope that something will come out of this. I updated my system while it was on 9.5 to 9.9 because I wanted Ironfall (for Ironhax in fact). I'm glad that I didn't update past that...

 

[Bubsy Bobcat]

o/

\o

 

[DutchyDutch]

I hope that something will come out of this. I updated my system while it was on 9.5 to 9.9 because I wanted Ironfall (for Ironhax in fact). I'm glad that I didn't update past that...

Same, but I was on 9.2 and I didn't know there was cfw.