First, most Hillary Clinton controversies are right-wing bullshit with little basis in reality. This is evidenced by the fact that the suicide of Vince Foster is even on the list, let alone many more ridiculous ones. Second, if we're going by an informal comparison of PolitiFact statements, Hillary Clinton doesn't lie much relative to other politicians. Get your facts straight.
The facts speak for themselves.
His political affiliation is irrelevant to the unbiased methodology he used to compile the chart. To argue that a fact cannot be trusted because it makes one side look good and the other side look bad is to ignore perfectly good facts. You don't get to cherry-pick facts in favor of some idealistic ideological balance while simultaneously saying you care about the facts. Whether or not something feels ideologically balanced has no bearing on whether or not that thing is true.
When a source like this cites garbage like a failure to close Guantanamo, something Obama wants to do but cannot because the Republicans are blocking him, or alleged ties to Wall Street that don't exist, as lies, then the source is bullshit. Hell, the source says Obama lied when he said he believed in public education just because he sent his kids to private schools, which is irrelevant to whether or not he believes in public education. It's absolute garbage. If you can't tell the difference between BS political spin and facts, then it's going to be pretty difficult for me to use reason to argue whom you should and shouldn't trust. In other words, I'm not going to bother to help you if you can't bother to put on your thinking cap and help yourself.
I mean, I don't mind discussing stuff like that, I'm just trying to figure out what prompted it
An abortion refers to the intentional termination of a pregnancy. So, aborting an embryo or fetus, by definition, is when you terminate a fetus or embryo before birth.
There shouldn't be any executions.
I'm not arguing that PolitiFact is perfect. In fact, I have quite a few problems with PolitiFact. They've ironically made some absolute bullshit rulings in an obvious effort to seem ideologically balanced. However, most of what's on the right of your little screen grab doesn't contradict what's on the left. So, for both of these reasons, I'm not sure what your point is.
Really? PolitiFact's truly biggest issue is how they decide what constitutes each level in their ranking. But all in all it is pretty accurate and does much better then say FAIR or most fact checking departments of news outlets.
Its ratings are sometimes quite terrible, sometimes rating blatantly true things as half-true or mostly-false. They've also rated blatantly false statements as half-true. These aren't including the ratings that have changed over the years when confronted with the actual evidence.
@
AncientBoi:
@NoiseCommander3DS Would you please turn down that noise. I haven't had my COFFEE yet...
+1
