Now I'm curious, it would be best of me to do some research, try to find out about the hardware and OS of this console.
Yeah, but at this point, other than reading, there is not a LOT you or I could do. Others with a lot of coding experience are working on Wii and others I do not know of (maybe working, maybe not). I wrote to Marcan and doubt he would read it and highly doubt it would warrant a response. I had an interesting view on development. I get why he does not want Wii U exploit out. However, that is already happening. So, people get bogged down drying to make "stuff" to get homebrew going for vWii that can use three CPU cores.
1.) No gamepad as Wii U side of GPU is not used (confirmed by f0f blog itself).
2.) Piracy already out and once released and cloned (WiikeyU), that will become more prevalent.
3.) IS it possible to produce homebrew and apps with what is already there in the Wii U? Drivers there, device access there, gamepad access there, etc.
I don't know enough for #3 but was thinking, since piracy will already exist, only thing the Wii U mode remaining locked will do is make homebrew take a lot longer to get into.
Wii stuff is already out and worked on, and being ported to vWii (when/where necessary). People still work on this, and hell, they still work on GC emulation/tools/loaders. Liboc or whatever that is for Wii has been worked on for years and years.
A lot of people with the know-how are working quietly OR like Marcan said, 31 had info but have not released anything. Not sure if linux in vWii is being worked on either. Not sure with hole Marcan did share. May be nobody is working on it (just don't know).
IF all the stuff for meaningful homebrew that goes beyond Wii (or vWii with Wii U processors) will require Wii U anyway, it may be devs will simply not bother until that is opened up. ESPECIALLY if more needs developed.
I wanted to ask if the stuff to dev for Wii U would be easily available if Wii U mode were unlocked.
I don't know, and am not sure anyone outside of people like Marcan know for sure. "Oh, yeah, can do this, then this, and the driver is there so need the call here, we could run apps to access those things, here like this." Probably not like this, but I wanted to ask THIS. Sort of asked Comex in PM, wrote to Marcan to ask. This is curiosity here, an ignorant guy curious about it. My frame of reference is 360. Alternative dashboard, or stock dashboard with the "Locks" removed. People said they did not use "Official SDK" for 360 but seriously, does it matter? Unlock, let people make their own apps and tools, and if the FRAMEWORK is there and does not need to be built from the ground up, why not?
IF the process still must be done and Marcan is leading with pieces of cheese then this is all silly. In my neophyte view though, if one can access everything, turn locks off, pieces are there, lol, can they not just be "Taken"? Roms on Android phones; drivers are there, they just take stock (MOST TIMES) or base Android version, and can tweak kernels, themes, built in apps, etc. This is kind of what I am thinking. If we can get root, or definitely UNLOCK the bootloader (analogy here), then people could do anything from linux for entire Wii U, maybe even dual boot linux and primary OS, or just HBC and see if devs want to go to work. People on blog had good points; piracy will happen. I BET somebody will take what Marcan gave, then go about it to get those things they want. Creative people out there in the world. If people want to dev, they probably want to express themselves but lack ability to make groundwork. Those who did that for Wii do not seem interested in Wii U (that I can see).
This is not a knock on anything, and if I am wrong, hey, even having Wii U mode unlocked would be meaningless for devs. I am naive but genuinely curious. Might get reply from experts but I am just little old me.