Fire Emblem stole 200+ hours of my life. It's as close to Shining Force as I'll ever see
So my vote goes to FE:A
So my vote goes to FE:A
Why's that?
Just curious.
I've only played Pokemon Y on that list (I have SMT IV but I haven't gotten around to it yet) but it was pretty average. I'd say in terms of where it lies on the list of best and worst Pokemon games, easily smack-dab in the middle. It's not nearly as good as GSC or Platinum but it's certainly not as bad and BW or RSE.
IMO, the game focused way too much on its story that wasn't really that good. I love the little details that was added to the game so it wasn't all bad.IMO BW>XY
Why is BW bad?
IMO BW>XY
Why is BW bad?
Zelda, pokemon and fire emblem are good, havent played any of the three yet, but i voted for pokemon because the fire emblem got way to much pay to win stuff
Erm. Yeah, its clear that you didn't play fire emblem.
There are loads of optional DLCs, its not pay to win though. Its pay for map packs. The game itself is a full fledged game. The DLCs are meant for hardcore fire emblem fans. If you're a casual player, not getting the DLCs will not affect your gaming experience.
Come on, don't speculate when you do not have the entire picture.
The game is freaking amazing and you can get like 100+ hours out of it without bothering with the DLC. I don't think there'll be an option to get the game + all the DLC anytime soon, if ever. Besides, it's very much a complete game without the DLC.I haven't played this game yet. Although i am big fan of fire emblem, i refused myself to play the game until there is a option to get all the dlc too.
Ofcourse ALL THE BONUS in any games will not effect your gameplay, so it doesnt mean they shouldn't have it added as bonus instead of as PAID DLC.
My point on this still stand, the developer have now the option to add PLANNED extra feature as PAID DLC instead of free extra feature, because we as consumer are retarded enough to buy those.