-
Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions.
Poll: 73% of Trump Voters Think Democrats Are Trying to ‘Replace White Americans With Immigrants And People Of Color’
- Thread starter Creamu
- Start date
- Views 9,621
- Replies 163
Sorry, did not see your post before. I generally don't like the idea of replacing people, because it has genocidal overtones to me. I much more prefer the idea of freedom of association. If people want to live in a society where the ethnic integrity of 'white americans' is no concern, they should be free to do so, as well as those who want to live in a society that upholds the ethnic intergrity of 'white americans', they should be free to do so as well.
When it comes to discussing race, ethnicities, and history, people tend to get very defensive without really knowing much.
The Americas were colonized by Europeans (or to simply "whites") so saying that we Europeans aren't immigrants is pretty ignorant, as Europeans were the settlers and immigrants and are. Yes, being born in a country even if you don't have the ancestry makes you a legal citizen, but in terms of heritage, still an immigrant.
Furthermore, countries in the Americas went thru several stages until they finally decided on which flag would be their official one. Here's two examples: America and Brazil.
America
While Old Glory is brilliant, I love Betsy Ross' flag.
Brazil
It made me chuckle they copied America's flag for November 15-19, 1889.
The native U.S./Brazilian/Mexico/Argentina/etc people were and are the Native Indians, not the Europeans, Africans, or whatever.
Before it was officially called U.S., the Natives gave it different names: https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-old-name-of-the-USA (e.g. The Indies, Turtle Island, Newfoundland, Amerigo Vespucci)
Did you know, the U.S. doesn't have an official language so while English is the primary, it means others can be used validly. Why did they never officialize a language? They must have forgotten to do so, I guess.
So, it's like the Europeans in South Africa saying they're South Africans (I mean, they're actually not, but they were born there so whatever value that has to them).
The Americas were colonized by Europeans (or to simply "whites") so saying that we Europeans aren't immigrants is pretty ignorant, as Europeans were the settlers and immigrants and are. Yes, being born in a country even if you don't have the ancestry makes you a legal citizen, but in terms of heritage, still an immigrant.
Furthermore, countries in the Americas went thru several stages until they finally decided on which flag would be their official one. Here's two examples: America and Brazil.
America
While Old Glory is brilliant, I love Betsy Ross' flag.
Brazil
It made me chuckle they copied America's flag for November 15-19, 1889.
The native U.S./Brazilian/Mexico/Argentina/etc people were and are the Native Indians, not the Europeans, Africans, or whatever.
Before it was officially called U.S., the Natives gave it different names: https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-old-name-of-the-USA (e.g. The Indies, Turtle Island, Newfoundland, Amerigo Vespucci)
Did you know, the U.S. doesn't have an official language so while English is the primary, it means others can be used validly. Why did they never officialize a language? They must have forgotten to do so, I guess.
So, it's like the Europeans in South Africa saying they're South Africans (I mean, they're actually not, but they were born there so whatever value that has to them).
In as much as they have the right to choose to not personally breed with not-white people, sure. In any other sense, unless they have their own private country on their own private land then they need to suck it up and deal with reality if they want to exist in society. If they don't want to exist in society, that's fine too.
White people in London and Birmingham and a few other cities in UK have been replaced by non white people. Look at a photo of London in 1940, just google it, and then look in 2022. White people are being replaced in lots of places and that's not a conspiricy theory, it's a fact.
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2021
- Messages
- 680
- Trophies
- 0
- Age
- 34
- Location
- The Best State on The Best Coast
- XP
- 826
- Country
Let's not try to rope UK/EU into this mess as that is a whole other bag of fuckery there. That's less to do with replacements and more about the EU accepting mass refugees into its countries which caused the tip in the average. In fact if I recall correctly the refugee issue was one of the big reasons why the UK wanted to split from the EU in the first place.
The issue was quickly dealt with and the usual suspects largely overreacted. What helped Brexit was a misinformation campaign where Cambridge Analytica profiled social media users and sent the fake news that Turkey had been admitted to the European Union in the day before the referendum only to susceptible people.
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2013
- Messages
- 17,760
- Trophies
- 3
- Location
- The Lands Between
- Website
- gbatemp.net
- XP
- 8,601
- Country
Definitely no shortage of white people. Guess mrdude thinks more than 10% "other" is unacceptable. God forbid he find out that white people don't have children exclusively with each other.
Ethiopian Jewish migrants appearntly had a bad experience. Maybe it will work better for white people...
https://www.africanglobe.net/africa/israel-forcibly-sterilized-ethiopian-jews/
It seems like if you do a genetic test proving you have jewish genes you have a good chance immgrating to isreal. Maybe white people qualify?
https://academic.oup.com/jlb/article/2/2/469/826237?login=false
Forgive me if I'm wrong, but are you implying that this genetic testing could lead to the nation of Israel forcibly sterilizing every "white" person that tries to immigrate there?
While forced sterilization is, obviously horrific, no country is obligated to take in anyone who isn't a resident in said country, be it immigrant, asylum seeker, infiltrator, what have you. The problem in America however, is that people forgo learning the difference between legal immigrants and otherwise to hide their blatant racism.
So, it seems that your links to forced sterilization and DNA sampling on migration are being used as standing points for replacement theory, am I correct in thinking this?
Similar threads
- Locked
