In my first post I said, that a defragmentation tool is not needed. Nevertheless I will bring my knowledge and help for this project. What's wrong with this?
--- snip ---
I'm sure that for most users FAT/NTFS is the better choice. But the reasons most people announce are wrong. It's not the technical aspect, it's the usability for the average users. And every time a user says "I'm using WBFS" there are a lot of statements like "WBFS is bad/outdated/poor/slow/waste". You can find such single (trolling/flaming) statements also in this thread. And my fight is against these preconceptions, because they are simply wrong.
I will now quit this discussion level ...