2026 Midterm Discussions

  • Thread starter Thread starter x65943
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 212
  • Replies Replies 14
  • Likes Likes 1
  • Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions. Saying NO to fascists/nazis - if you are one of those, you are not welcome here

x65943

Attack car enjoyer
Supervisor
GBAtemp Patron
Joined
Jun 23, 2014
Messages
7,679
Solutions
3
Reaction score
52,092
Trophies
11
Location
Taekwondo Gym
XP
49,130
Country
United States
1789436332132.png


The US midterms are coming up, and while the house is predicted to go blue, the Senate is seen as more of a toss-up. Most races have clear favorites, but control of the Senate will be decided by 6 races: Texas, Alaska, Iowa, Maine, Michigan and Ohio.

The list of states here is particularly interesting because most of these tossups have been long term Republican strongholds.

Below are the number of years since the last Democrat Senator:
Texas, 33 years
Alaska, 11 years
Iowa, 11 years
Maine, 31 years*
Michigan, current
Ohio, 1 year
*Maine's Independent senator caucuses with Democrats

Betting markets currently show a 52-53% Democrat Senate win.

What do you think will happen? Will the price of diesel at a record $6/gallon finally break the 30+ year Republican stranglehold on Texas? Will Alaska break blue? What are the implications for the 2028 presidential election?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOnYa
Senate by nature of design will always favor conservative states but I would agree with the betting market despite that. Maybe MAGA will have finally opened their eyes and grown a couple brain cells after all we've seen since the pedo and rapist won re-election.
 
Last edited by SeltzerMist,
  • Like
Reactions: BigOnYa and x65943
Senate by nature of design will always factor conservative states but I would agree with the betting market despite that. Maybe MAGA will have finally opened their eyes and grown a couple brain cells after all we've seen since the pedo and rapist won re-election.
I think a lot of the Trump voters are fed up, Democrats are ahead in 5/6 of these key states

Screenshot_20260914-214006.png
Screenshot_20260914-214236.png
Screenshot_20260914-214327.png
Screenshot_20260914-214402.png
Screenshot_20260914-214428.png
Screenshot_20260914-214452.png
 
The US midterms are coming up, and while the house is predicted to go blue, the Senate is seen as more of a toss-up. Most races have clear favorites, but control of the Senate will be decided by 6 races: Texas, Alaska, Iowa, Maine, Michigan and Ohio.

The list of states here is particularly interesting because most of these tossups have been long term Republican strongholds.

Below are the number of years since the last Democrat Senator:
Texas, 33 years
Alaska, 11 years
Iowa, 11 years
Maine, 31 years*
Michigan, current
Ohio, 1 year
*Maine's Independent senator caucuses with Democrats

Betting markets currently show a 52-53% Democrat Senate win.

What do you think will happen? Will the price of diesel at a record $6/gallon finally break the 30+ year Republican stranglehold on Texas? Will Alaska break blue? What are the implications for the 2028 presidential election?
I think I've given up on predicting US elections. Not going to bother to look at the polls or anything else. They're a country with a broken electoral system and an uneducated electorate, so logic doesn't apply. That being said, I can still hope that the stain of MAGA is wiped from the world, only to exists in history books along with the confederate army.

The reciprocal tariffs coming from Canada are also specifically targeting each of those swing states to make sure they feel miserable about the economy going into the election. So we can hope that helps sway things in some way.
 
I think I've given up on predicting US elections. Not going to bother to look at the polls or anything else. They're a country with a broken electoral system and an uneducated electorate, so logic doesn't apply. That being said, I can still hope that the stain of MAGA is wiped from the world, only to exists in history books along with the confederate army.

The reciprocal tariffs coming from Canada are also specifically targeting each of those swing states to make sure they feel miserable about the economy going into the election. So we can hope that helps sway things in some way.
The Senate is broken in the way that a state with fewer people than DC (WY) gets as many senators as NY or CA

(A system put in place to allow southern states more of a say in the government)

But, it is still a democratic system and it's possible to win these states. Look at Texas - no Democrat for 33 years, and now a Democrat is leading in polls

All I can say is, if Trump keeps bombing Iran and driving inflation - the Senate will be blue for sure
 
$5000 (even if true) or a blue House and Senate, I'd definitely take the latter.
The magic of it is

If you give everyone $5000, you have actually devalued the entire money supply so that it is collectively worth $5000 less per person

It's a really dumb idea

Would not be surprised if Musk visits those 6 states......
I hope he does, I'm pretty sure most people don't like him

Screenshot_20260914-220708.png

https://www.natesilver.net/p/elon-musk-polls-popularity-nate-silver-bulletin
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOnYa
The Senate is broken in the way that a state with fewer people than DC (WY) gets as many senators as NY or CA

(A system put in place to allow southern states more of a say in the government)

But, it is still a democratic system and it's possible to win these states. Look at Texas - no Democrat for 33 years, and now a Democrat is leading in polls

All I can say is, if Trump keeps bombing Iran and driving inflation - the Senate will be blue for sure
If it takes starting a new pointless war, alienating every ally you have, threatening to annex multiple friendly countries, starting a tariff war, and destroying the entire economy of one of the richest countries in the world for a state to POSSIBLY flip, then it's not a good system.

Similarly, the only reason that a democrat is leading in the polls in Texas is because they put up the absolute WORST republican in history to run against him. The democrat is a straight male who has no drama or scandals behind him, and he's studying to be a damn priest!!! The only thing they can throw at him is saying he's pro-trans, like anybody cares what trans people are doing while the economy is going to shit. So again, if it takes a boy scout to run against the scum of Texas, and even then may just barely squeak out a win, the system is broken in more ways than just the electoral college.
 
If it takes starting a new pointless war, alienating every ally you have, threatening to annex multiple friendly countries, starting a tariff war, and destroying the entire economy of one of the richest countries in the world for a state to POSSIBLY flip, then it's not a good system.

Similarly, the only reason that a democrat is leading in the polls in Texas is because they put up the absolute WORST republican in history to run against him. The democrat is a straight male who has no drama or scandals behind him, and he's studying to be a damn priest!!! The only thing they can throw at him is saying he's pro-trans, like anybody cares what trans people are doing while the economy is going to shit. So again, if it takes a boy scout to run against the scum of Texas, and even then may just barely squeak out a win, the system is broken in more ways than just the electoral college.
It's not as broken as you make it out to be

1789438729382.png


The Senate has actually had more Democrat control than the house in recent years
 
It's not as broken as you make it out to be

View attachment 590732

The Senate has actually had more Democrat control than the house in recent years
That's an interesting graph, and I was looking at it for a while. It's a little heartening to see, but then I remember everything that had to be done in order to even get to that.

As you mentioned, low population state voters have more weight to their ballots. PACs are spending billions to influence the people of key states. The people are bombarded with commercials containing blatant lies or a huge bending of the truth. The people in power are allowed to draw their own congressional maps. The saying is that you don't choose the politician, the politician chooses you.

Of course there is also the issue of the uninformed electorate. I'm sure we've all seen the videos of people on both sides not knowing the absolute basics of what's going on in their own country. The democrats have the populist position on basically everything. The vast majority of the country wants universal health care, common sense gun control, abortion rights, safety nets, etc. Yet it isn't shown in the elections as it should.
 
That's an interesting graph, and I was looking at it for a while. It's a little heartening to see, but then I remember everything that had to be done in order to even get to that.

As you mentioned, low population state voters have more weight to their ballots. PACs are spending billions to influence the people of key states. The people are bombarded with commercials containing blatant lies or a huge bending of the truth. The people in power are allowed to draw their own congressional maps. The saying is that you don't choose the politician, the politician chooses you.

Of course there is also the issue of the uninformed electorate. I'm sure we've all seen the videos of people on both sides not knowing the absolute basics of what's going on in their own country. The democrats have the populist position on basically everything. The vast majority of the country wants universal health care, common sense gun control, abortion rights, safety nets, etc. Yet it isn't shown in the elections as it should.
Only about 1/3 want socialized healthcare
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-r...esponsibility-to-ensure-health-care-coverage/

About 50/50 split on whether Americans think right to bear arms or gun control is more important
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/07/24/key-facts-about-americans-and-guns/

Abortion is about 60/40 split
https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/fact-sheet/public-opinion-on-abortion/

Calling this the vast majority is an oversimplification when you can see that actually:

Majority (2/3) want a system other than single payer socialized healthcare

Gun rights is 50/50

And abortion is 60/40 with something like 15 states being majority opinion anti-abortion

///

Is there gerrymandering, of course. Is there small state bias, of course. But none of that changes the fact that Americans are indeed divided on these topics.
 
That seems to be ignoring the 66% who want universal healthcare. But yes, 1/3 want a choice of either private or government.

About 50/50 split on whether Americans think right to bear arms or gun control is more important
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/07/24/key-facts-about-americans-and-guns/
Not sure if that is they're asking the right questions there. How you phrase the question makes a difference.

Sorry, but I GPT'ed these stats:
58% say U.S. gun laws should be stricter overall (Pew).
92% support background checks for all gun purchases in a Gallup poll.
86% support preventing people deemed dangerous to themselves or others from purchasing guns.
81% support red-flag laws allowing courts to temporarily remove guns from people considered dangerous.
79% support raising the minimum gun-buying age to 21.
64% support banning assault-style weapons, although this is considerably more partisan.

These are the common sense laws that people want.
This is another one where the way the question is asked makes a big difference. If you ask someone should abortion be legal, they may be split 60-40. If you ask someone if they believe it should be legal if someone needs it because they'll die, they were raped, or the fetus is non-viable, the percentage goes up.

Is there gerrymandering, of course. Is there small state bias, of course. But none of that changes the fact that Americans are indeed divided on these topics.
We have 66% for some form of universal healthcare, 70-80% in favor of common sense gun laws, and an abortion issue which is favored in it's basic form, and much more favored depending on the situation. I think that's a lot to work with for the democrats.

On the flip-side, what have the conservatives been running on? Anti-trans rights? Who gives a crap! That feels like the only drum they've been beating for years now.
 
If the Republicans win the majority after everything Trump has done, then Americans are truly doomed by their own greed and stupidity. Even if Trump gave 5K to everyone, he would completely tank the economy to do so. If he doesn’t (implying the GOP gets the majority) then Trump supporters fell for it again. It’s literally a no-win situation for Republicans.
 
That seems to be ignoring the 66% who want universal healthcare. But yes, 1/3 want a choice of either private or government.


Not sure if that is they're asking the right questions there. How you phrase the question makes a difference.

Sorry, but I GPT'ed these stats:
58% say U.S. gun laws should be stricter overall (Pew).
92% support background checks for all gun purchases in a Gallup poll.
86% support preventing people deemed dangerous to themselves or others from purchasing guns.
81% support red-flag laws allowing courts to temporarily remove guns from people considered dangerous.
79% support raising the minimum gun-buying age to 21.
64% support banning assault-style weapons, although this is considerably more partisan.

These are the common sense laws that people want.

This is another one where the way the question is asked makes a big difference. If you ask someone should abortion be legal, they may be split 60-40. If you ask someone if they believe it should be legal if someone needs it because they'll die, they were raped, or the fetus is non-viable, the percentage goes up.


We have 66% for some form of universal healthcare, 70-80% in favor of common sense gun laws, and an abortion issue which is favored in it's basic form, and much more favored depending on the situation. I think that's a lot to work with for the democrats.

On the flip-side, what have the conservatives been running on? Anti-trans rights? Who gives a crap! That feels like the only drum they've been beating for years now.
It's true, if you contort the question to fit your underlying biases you can make it seem like everyone agrees with the stance you have

But if you look at what I shared, those are very unbiased questions and show the splits I described

It's simply true, lots of Americans don't want single payer socialized healthcare, don't want more restrictive gun laws at the expense of gun freedoms, and don't agree with abortion legalization
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum