@weiff
I understand what your saying but think about what I'm saying for a second.
The current image he has used is wrong on so many things.
First the actual box sizes for where the small images load too is way off size. I originally did that as a test at 50% the original ones and then AppleBelly asked me to make it fit size 64x90.
So what I did was I went back to the image and began to resize and it was then I realised the whole thing was off center. So I fixed it and made the new size boxes as he requested. So I was working with him here to get it right for him.
On top of this the original flawed image, the small boxes are not evenly spread out, again it was just a test while he was coding other stuff. So when I made the new version I spaced them out correctly with the box sized to fit the 64x90 images.
So what's happened now is AppleBelly and yourself are asking me to make a flawed image to fit flawed positions. It doesn't even make sense. regardless of how functional it is, it defeats the point of making it look like this if your going to just make it all off center and uneven.
So as much as I could do it, I think in this case it's a small thing to fix to get it totally correct. I do not see the point in having everyone use a image that is worng and uneven and as a result the small images load to off center and unevenly spaced positions.
What's happened is while he was asleep he missed lots of updates and came back and just carried on without even checking what I had fixed. Now your saying to me to be happy. I spent 5 hours modifying these images last night for his loader. 56killer helped me out and made the loader work with page 2. AppleBelly hasn't even added that to his because he has just done his own thing. I'm not being unreasonable here but ffs, does it make sense to add what was designed or just have half assed stuff because he won't take out 10 minutes to reposition to match the actually PROPER image.