Last we heard from TX they were searching for Switch units that have been patched by Nintendo in the factory, and they have just announced today that support for these so-called "unhackable Switches" will be coming in due time from the developers at Xecuter, so stay tuned for more news regarding this amazing development in the near future, in the meantime, read their official announcement below regarding the IPATCH changes as they slowly work on getting to the bottom of it, and finish working on releasing complete SX PRO and SX OS support in due time!

Dear fans, we hope you're all enjoying your weekend!

Recently, it has come to our attention there's a new revision of the Nintendo Switch in the wild which is incompatible with our SX Pro product. This isn't simply an incompatibility with SX Pro but rather appeared to be a fix of the infamous "USB RCM" exploit.

Naturally, we had to locate one of these new Switch units to get to the bottom of this. Our new Switch unit arrived to us at firmware version 5.1.0 and what we found out is the following (sorry, time to get a bit technical):

One of the IPATCH entries in the fuse set (entry #3) has been replaced with a new patch. The old patch patches the bootrom location 0x10fb3c with the value "00 20" (mov r0, #0 in thumb), and the new patch patches the bootrom location 0x10769a with the value "00 21" (mov r1, #0 in thumb). This new patch effectively zeroes out the upper-byte of the wLength field in the USB RCM endpoint 0 handling code.

Those who are paying attention probably wonder how we know the exact details of this IPATCH entry change, since we can't read out the fuses without our precious USB RCM exploit, right? It is a classic chicken and egg problem.

The answer is obvious: There is more than one coldboot bootrom exploit, and it is not just the warmboot one.

So don't fear: we will deliver a solution for these new "unhackable" switches in due time!

Thank you for attention.

-- Team-Xecuter - Rocking the Switch in 2018 and beyond! --

Source: MaxConsole

 

[8BitWonder]

Xecuter? 2018-2002= 16 years old
Okay, so they're a hell of a thief, since I've known their team since 2002.

Here they stole code apparently from xbox one
https://team-xecuter.com/dosbox-running-on-xbox-one/

I could also tell you how they advanced, progressed the x360 scene, but I'm not pro xecuter, just the truth..

That article you linked just mentions how they got DosBox running the with new (at the time) UWP applications that you could make for XBone.

No code thievery there at all.

 

[KHEOPS]

And the ability the team has to build reliable hardware and efficient code, who wrote the code to run xci please? ....
Le X360USB PRO de Xecuter
https://team-xecuter.com/xecuter-x360usb-pro/
Anyway, if you think that xecuter are incompetant in coding is your point of view

 

[8BitWonder]

And the ability the team has to build reliable hardware and efficient code, who wrote the code to run xci please? ....
Le X360USB PRO de Xecuter
https://team-xecuter.com/xecuter-x360usb-pro/
Anyway, if you think that xecuter are incompetant in coding is your point of view

I'm not sure what you're trying to convey at this point.

 

[KHEOPS]

Well this message is addressed to those who write here that they are code thieves,
so I ask who encoded the way to run the xci format on nintendo switch?
Since it steals the gpl code, they exist since 2002, on nintendo switch, on x360,xbox one, and maybe even a member was working at the time on amiga... In short in computer science to steal code, it is necessary to know programmed...

The link posted ,is not perfect but the post is the one there
Team-Xecuter has joined forces with "Xbox Live Stealth"... The only solution in the world with complete AW Off cheat menus and seamless AW / GHOSTS / BO2 bypass without ban on Xbox Live for an online JTAG / RGH experience purchased by TX & XLS
Another point, they sometimes partner up, team up.

Well if one day it's the switch's turn

 

[Samus20XX]

shills goin hard rn