(here's real kicker, instead of paying for the streaming service for 10 plus year old games with psn -psp/ps2/ps3- for the ps4, if the sony sharks really wanted to play fair they would only charge the small fee for the size in gigabytes, for whatever the user wanted to download.....................instead of back paying the ISP's for the bandwidth on their services they impose on the customer and the service provider, when they peddle those old games, many developers do not oppose those same releases being available for free with emulators on the pc..................so why is sony carrying around all that dead weight?)
(what sony allows in its quality control department, undertones the larger picture, and problem, of their own lack of policing in accessibility for straight downloads versus streaming, that is just one issue, but also the issue of offering free trial periods for all purchases, and transferable discounts for physical game disks..................the vita took a punch that was intended for the ps4, 20 years ago when things were getting started, you did not have computers capable of emulation, hard drives in 2000 gig sizes with largely unused space, because of the lack of transition in policies that were designed to curtail consumer habits to protect the market exchanges for the consumer...................right now that old system is showing its age.)
(what the sony sharks have is, a gold mine of video games, that no other competitor has, and because of that, because sony has decided to use that mechanism in its streaming services or other, it has set a very bad example, because of its expired piracy concerns....................its not just STEAM, or the future of more accessible and free gaming services and servers, but the ISP's that waste bandwidth ineffectively because of corporate mussle, can easily throw off the switch in pay to play online services..................this generation did not see these sweeping changes, but, I believe perhaps with the engima of VR losing its grip, that the internet will regain its reputation for low cost, and free, that it had in the early 1990s, in one respect or another)
(you buy the game, and you paid for the console, now it is up to the federal government and the ISP providers to eliminate gaming companies ability to charge for their online services, you don't even have to provide a server to play with or the bandwidth, don't people understand how powerful these servers really are? or how much people can be served with one server, given today's hardware, there's some major needs for updates, the ISP providers, need some exclusive rights, the way business is being done right now on several points will simply have to be overhauled................the crackdown can come later, but I suggest the sony sharks prepare themselves at least, for additional government and corporate freedoms in the product you sell to consumers considering the amount of resources it is ineffectively utilizing in the consumer process, and up keep)
(this is ground that already is penetrated in some areas, steam, is not a good example, but there you have it, one pay to play site with about all of their releases available for free if you use google, lmao, now, the rule is so far that concerns the sell of the produce and game rights, everything beyond and after that, the languages of the law needs addressment, in internet terms this is equivalent to a universal welfare system, where the middle class and rich are encouraged by law, to carry a welfare card for benefits)
