"Now lasts 1 DAY each" (Or as long as it takes) Debate IV Media Censorship. Protective or Restrictive?How to debate Warning: Spoilers inside! We will be debating about a question, make your point heard. If the question is: Can we live without air? A response can be: No, because air sustains life. Another can be: No, that point is wrong because we can live on Oxygen alone, not air. Another can be: No, because plants need CO2 which is in air to live, and without plants, we would die. and so on. OK. You will find today's debate title at the top of this post/in the topic description. Happy debating! I am impartial to this and will ignore the posts I have made to count the final score, as they were made solely to get the debate up and running. I will judge which side has won at the end, however will join the debate. The debate will last ONE DAY Previous Debates Warning: Spoilers inside! Can we live without modern technology? The 'Temp says we can. Will the world end in 2012? The 'Temp says 'fuck no'. Genetic/DNA Manipulation on humans. Should it be legal in the UK? The 'Temp thinks that it should be legal Media Censorship? Protective or Restrictive. The 'temp believes media censorship is restrictive Future Debates Warning: Spoilers inside! 5 Health and Safety laws. Protective or restrictive? 6 Equal Rights for Gays, Lesbians and Bisexuals. 7 Marijuana should be legalized solely for medicinal use. 8 Medical Research on animals. Does it do more good than harm? 9 Will Space be colonized? ~suggested by Scott-105 10 Should fascists be given a platform to speak? ~Suggested by TrolleyDave ... Description: Media Censorship. The censoring of innapropriate content and governmental secrets in the media. Is it protective to censor such things, or is it restrictive as to restrict the general public from hearing or reading certain texts and videos.