- Joined
- Aug 19, 2015
- Messages
- 9,937
- Trophies
- 1
- Location
- Glasgow
- Website
- www.rockstarnorth.com
- XP
- 15,174
- Country
-
So if I am understanding that correctly then pansexuals (assuming the term is not just a synonym for bisexual) are just gays in denial?Literally me
View attachment 189287
Pansexuality does to some extent overlap with bisexuality and a lot of people used them as synonyms and some don't. Ultimately the sexuality is a romantic regardless of gender. Some also associate that with bisexuality but it boils down to an argument of semantics. I call myself “pansexual” because it basically fits my mess of a sexuality.So if I am understanding that correctly then pansexuals (assuming the term is not just a synonym for bisexual) are just gays in denial?
Not necessarily what I would have expected a person such as yourself to have posted.
Is this some "it is all a simulation" thing again? Because I thought we agreed that even if it was then it makes no sense to treat it like it isn't and for the levels of computing power required to pull it off then existence or not becomes something of a moot point as you can still functionally observe it.But men and women don’t exist![]()
ヘ(。□°)ヘ"There's only one USB port but you can expand that with a splitter."
![]()
