So you are saying it is not AI that makes derp face as the kids would term it but in fact poor training data?
Everybody complains AI generated art can't do faces well enough to escape the uncanny valley, what if instead all the training data came from such things so when someone says this but in the style of a comic book face it imitates that.
Oh, I see.
It seems I didn't extrapolated info from first post.
Mmm... who knows?
I mean, the other day I was reading about a girl complaining that someone used her "art" to train AI.
Can't find the article anymore, but aside of the following claims: "Look! I used these colors here and this AI generated art used them too!" ... nothing else could be proven beyond the fact that colors exist.
I'm guessing, AI is getting trained with whatever they can find from the cringiest depths of DeviantArt and Patron?
Been seeing since 2012 onwards young ones posting their 5 year old skill drawings claiming/labeling whatever they do to be art, but don't know, aside of 4 panel low effort comics getting popular everywhere, I haven't been active nor been browsing anything related in many years.
But sure, now that I think about it, you might be right.
Not that I care much, but yeah
![Thinking face :thinking: 🤔](https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/twemoji/14.0.2/72x72/1f914.png)