Shabadage said:I wouldn't be surprised if little scratches massive mess up the discs, that's alot of data in a small area.
Linkiboy said:both of these still have truth to them
and i fail to see how its ironic
ps: blu-ray disks can still be damaged as much as dvds because the protective coating is required as the laser needs a much cleaner surface on a bluray disk than a dvd disk to read it properly

Sorry, your argument doesn't hold any water. True, the disks do have the "Durabis" protective-layer on them, but on the other hand, the damage of a scratch on a BD is still far more 'fatal' than the damage from the same-sized scratch on DVDs. Thus, the percentage of damaged disks is still approximately the same. And frankly, that's too much for me. And yes, the same is true for all optical disks, that's why I hate them. Note that this is just my opinion!ZeWarriorReturns said:You fail as a fanboy as much as you fail in life. BTW, I never stated they can't be damaged, and due to the hard coating the BD Discs don't pick up the finger prints and little scratches from handling the discs, do some research before posting BS.Linkiboy said:both of these still have truth to them
and i fail to see how its ironic
ps: blu-ray disks can still be damaged as much as dvds because the protective coating is required as the laser needs a much cleaner surface on a bluray disk than a dvd disk to read it properly
BS to both. The Wii is clearly in 1st Place.
Don't stray from the topic -- you and I both know he was talking about 360 vs. PS3 not the whole console generation.![]()
QUOTE

supermodchips said:Uh thebigboss14, did you realise that this thread is over a year old?
