New Zodiac dates for everyone

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vigilante
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 14,694
  • Replies Replies 176
Infinite Zero said:
Do some of you even read?
It only applies to those born after September 2009.

thanks PG. LMAO

where did you get that? i didn't find that sentence even in the source.
 
There's no reason to panicked. This is old news that has been known for years and keeps appearing and dying down every few years. Nothings changed, after a while people will forget about it and get back to not caring...
 
Gabbynaruto said:
What? Hey, what's wrong with Scorpio? Only 6 days? That's crap! I was, am, and always be a Scorpio. No Libra dammit! What was wrong with the old Zodiac anyway? The one who invented this one is crazy.
mad.gif

The people who invented this one were the ancient Babylonians.

The 13th sign, Ophiucus, has always been there, just like the Cat has actually always been there in the Chinese Zodiac.

It just got ditched because some cunt liked the number 12 better than the number 13.

It seems that I relate equally to both Pisces and Aries. Shame. I've always considered myself to be Aries.
 
Actually guys, this whole thing is not true. If you read articles, you would know the guy himself never said it's the 13th zodiac sign or ought to be. Plus even the old civilizations knew about the constellation, and chose not to include it.

Source. This is one among many other articles who say it's not true, even CNN debunks the theory. Plus I read somewhere that a real zodiac constellation has to pass through something and this one doesn't do it, so it's another reason why it's not counted.
 
Nathan Drake said:
Well, according to this, I get to be the new one that I can't say.

I prefer Saggitarius. I can say it, and....yeah. I'll just stick with that until I start getting hassled by dumb people.
Ophiuchus = Oh-fee-you-kus
QUOTE(Fel @ Jan 17 2011, 09:10 AM) Source. This is one among many other articles who say it's not true, even CNN debunks the theory. Plus I read somewhere that a real zodiac constellation has to pass through something and this one doesn't do it, so it's another reason why it's not counted.
The Sun has to pass in front of the constellation. The link you provided (as well as my Astronomy prof several years ago) said that the Sun DOES pass in front of Ophiuchus.

Doesn't really matter though. Astrology is a fake science. Anyone who believes the random nonsense spewed forth in horoscopes deserves to be laughed at.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum