What DYKG is plagiarizing is not the information, but the exact words of the person summarizing the findings, the research-itself--without giving due credit. That is an entirely different substance than the information-itself, the "fact" you say is being reappropriated (and reading mine saying this unfair, or some other lot).
The information is freely accessible to those with the means to gain it. However, DYKG's author takes the shortcut by lifting the research and viewpoints of others, often times directly (thus plagiarizing)--and that has been my main cue in my posts here. I don't think the information being expressed is of relevance--it is the work of others that is being unduly taken, without charitable measure nor regards verifying said-information. Regardless of the ethical standpoint of DYKG, it paints a desperate and haphazard picture of how DYKG regards its information in the first place.
