- Joined
- Nov 17, 2008
- Messages
- 19,148
- Solutions
- 6
- Reaction score
- 33,564
- Trophies
- 3
- Website
- defaultdnb.github.io
- XP
- 40,965
- Country


Are you saying we should pay for a Switch 2 and just put it in a drawer and not use it? That would be agony, I'd have to buy two Switch 2's, one to use and one to hide away.Whatever, If in the console there's a easy way to get full root access in launch day, it will be funny
Very peculiar that you'd rather use a modchip than a softmod to hack the Switch 2. A softmod is much safer, and is readily accessible to everyone once it's discovered. I have an unpatched v1 Switch and always turn it off when I don't plan to use it for a few days in a row. It just takes a few seconds to re-inject a payload when I turn it on again. It was your choice in the end to keep yours always powered on.

Yes, lite and OLED have nothing, and the Switch 2 will most likely not have an RCM mode, if not that something compelely different, and if not that, again nothing at all as there's genuinely no reason to have it if the exploit was patched as many times as it was and made inaccessible on later models, furthermore this is why so many are saying the modchip is the most plausible as we literally know nothing about the S2, other than what we've seen and the speculation about the magnet cons potentially having an exploit is just that: speculation. nonetheless i'm on team modchip.So this would still basically only be early units that also have the RCM exploit. (As far as I know, please correct this is if it is wrong.) Anything newer, including Lite and OLED models, have nothing.

Jesus, they melted the chips and drilled holes? Some people, man. THEY'RE FUCKING CRAZY, I TELL YA!Modchip.
Nintendo were probably so happy about hiding the D0 point on the OLED Switch so that modchips wouldn't work, until people started melting off the EMMC chips and drilling holes in the fucking motherboard. Wonder what other protection ideas N have come up with for Switch 2.
No it almost certainly won't be. Game-based exploits already effectively do not exist for the current Switch.Do you guys think that backward compatibility could be a door-opener for a console hack?
I doubt it, the hacking scene couldn't even keep Fusee under wraps and leaked it early.I wouldn't be surprised if the switch scene has been sitting on a new way to hack the original one but kept silent in hopes that the method is not patched on S2.
BC will for sure be sandboxed to make it hard or impossible to break out even if we are able to hack the Switch side.There is a non-zero chance that we already have something that allows to break S2. With the backwards compatibility, it's likely that there is a ton of similarities with the original Switch, and I wouldn't be surprised if the switch scene has been sitting on a new way to hack the original one but kept silent in hopes that the method is not patched on S2.
These statements don't relate to each other. Reimplementing something doesn't mean you find all vulnerabilities in it. Nintendo still made some stupid mistakes on the Switch and it'd be silly to assume they'd all be found by a handful of (very talented) people.The Switch microkernel has been reimplemented in Atmosphère and it is believed to have no vulnerabilities.
Famous last words. There are always vulnerabilities. It's just a matter of finding them.The microkernel of the Switch has no vulnerabilities. If there is an exploit in the browser, its capabilities will be extremely limited.
Yeah there's plenty of "stupid mistakes" on the Switch, just none of them lead anywhere. HOS is secure and the Switch 2 will be the sameThese statements don't relate to each other. Reimplementing something doesn't mean you find all vulnerabilities in it. Nintendo still made some stupid mistakes on the Switch and it'd be silly to assume they'd all be found by a handful of (very talented) people.
Famous last words. There are always vulnerabilities. It's just a matter of finding them.
Especially in WebKit. But not just in WebKit. I'm sure there's going to be fresh attack surface in the Switch 2, even if HOS is the only absolute secure OS in existence now.
What a dumb postWill we use a paperclip? Will we use a soldering iron? Or will we use the power of the Chaos Emeralds to mod it?
RCM was meant to run signed code only from the start. Mariko switches have RCM, they just aren't vulnerable to the buffer overflow leading into arbitrary code exec anymore. Supposedly Nintendo still uses RCM for repair and refurbishment.Yes, lite and OLED have nothing, and the Switch 2 will most likely not have an RCM mode, if not that something compelely different, and if not that, again nothing at all as there's genuinely no reason to have it if the exploit was patched as many times as it was and made inaccessible on later models, furthermore this is why so many are saying the modchip is the most plausible as we literally know nothing about the S2, other than what we've seen and the speculation about the magnet cons potentially having an exploit is just that: speculation. nonetheless i'm on team modchip.


