Thanks for the detailed info.These pages do a decent job explaining the technical stuff behind it.
http://3dbrew.org/wiki/FIRM#New_3DS_FIRM
http://3dbrew.org/wiki/9.6.0-24
Specifically the part in bold here is the roadblock
Thanks for the detailed info.These pages do a decent job explaining the technical stuff behind it.
http://3dbrew.org/wiki/FIRM#New_3DS_FIRM
http://3dbrew.org/wiki/9.6.0-24
Specifically the part in bold here is the roadblock
In before "Soon (tm)" jokes.
But seriously, i won't be holding my breath. ARCODE is pretty damn convenient already (well only on O3DS i guess)
With custom firmwares and CIA installation being a thing now, their business would have taken a big hit.
I was there biggest fan because i love the convenience of 3DS files (i can use my android phone to download and copy 3ds games to my gateway microSD) but can't see them hanging around for much longer.
I just wanted to share what Gateway said to me... Didn't mean to start anything...
sig'dGaytewait features list:
-We are working on GBA/DSi VC game support and should be released soon
-We are working on cheat support and should be released soon
-We are working on 9.5+ EmuNAND for N3DS and should be released soon
-We are working on a brick code for DSTwo+ users and should be released soon
GAYTEWAIT Team
If homemenuhax is able to obtain kernel access, then it'd probably be used as an exploit vector on 9.3+, which hasn't happened yet, so this is an absolute longshot.I wonder if gateway is going to implement homemenuhax, so that we can load gateway by just booting up the 3ds (instead of loading the browser or system settings exploit).
I wonder if gateway is going to implement homemenuhax, so that we can load gateway by just booting up the 3ds (instead of loading the browser or system settings exploit).
Also all the new exploits for 10.X make me wonder if gateway's going to come out with a way to run gateway on systems higher than 9.2.
Gateway 9.2 support started when ninjhax got released. Support for higher firmware versions isn't a big deal for anyone on who's on 9.2, but still it would be big news for gateway.
i think he means homemenuhax on 9.2 or lower. i saw a member post this earlier in another thread, not sure if it was himIf homemenuhax is able to obtain kernel access, then it'd probably be used as an exploit vector on 9.3+, which hasn't happened yet, so this is an absolute longshot.
It wasn't me who posted on the other thread.i think he means homemenuhax on 9.2 or lower. i saw a member post this earlier in another thread, nut sure if it was him
ik, btw i just saw a typo in my post: Nut instead of NotIt wasn't me who posted on the other thread.
homemenuhax should be possible as an entry point on 9.2 and under, anything over 9.2 is a stretch. Even if gateway has some method of getting it to work on 10.x, it will be a long time before we see it.
Gaytewait? How matureGaytewait features list:
-We are working on GBA/DSi VC game support and should be released soon
-We are working on cheat support and should be released soon
-We are working on 9.5+ EmuNAND for N3DS and should be released soon
-We are working on a brick code for DSTwo+ users and should be released soon
GAYTEWAIT Team
Not to forget they even gave option for free to everyone to downgrade from any firmware under 9.2 to 4.x and use cfw and you can create emunand, later cfw improved a lot with rxtools.Gaytewait? How mature
And this so-called "Gatewait" gave us game loading, region free, a 7.x encryption solution, >4.x support, emuNAND, cia installs on >4.x, and an myriad of other features before anyone else. But of course, people like you are going to be brats about things and look for things to bitch all the time about regardless of what they're given.
Not to forget they even gave option for free to everyone to downgrade from any firmware under 9.2 to 4.x and use cfw and you can create emunand, later cfw improved a lot with rxtools.
After all they did a lot of good work which i respect them, even though i havent bought a gateway card.
It's funny that Gateway felt the need to brick clone users but didn't think of requiring a GW cartridge to downgrade or create emuNAND. That would have slowed down the CFW scene by a large margin.
