@sputnix, whilst it's true that IGPs are not designed for gaming, that does not mean you should not be gaming, nor does it mean that "very few games will run". This may come as a shock to you, but the majority of games will run on integrated graphics. The issue is that some of the newer games (and some of the older games) will have compatability issues, either because the graphics are handled in a different way to ATI/AMD or nVidia graphics, or because the devs didn't have the budget/support/skill to optimise their game to work well on integrated graphics. The Intel HD 3000 can run Battlefield 2 and Crysis. Sure, the devs behind it had lots more money to send towards compatability with different graphics chipsets, but it's just proof that it's at least capable of playable gaming on modern games.
any card can
run a game perse but that doesn't mean it can run it well even on the lowest setting. The OP said he can run L4D 2 and Orcs must die on medium settings, both aren't that graphically intensive and one is a source game, if you can't run a source game on high then you can't run most modern games like fallout 3 with a reliable framerate. here's a link to it's specs
http://www.notebookc...on.43710.0.html, while it looks promising it has horrible frame rate with most games on high, and decent framerate on low at the lowest resolution. It can improve with better drivers but that can be hit or miss.
Also if you actually read my post carefully you would know that I
used to game with a INTEGRATED GRAPHICS CARD. I was lucky just to be able to run CS:S and TF2 was barely playable on the lowest settings. His card is better so it should run most games ok on the lowest possible settings. I tried to make my post as nice as possible with what I had to say but I guess it was too negative for you to take.