Not at all, I can still drive it no? Just not on the public street. Also I can get my license back, it won't be gone forever 99% of the time.
According to Swedish law, a ToS can't be setup without a PROPER signing. Example BankID or handwriting. Else it's invalid.
You said that the opposite is wrong. You said exactly this, but in other words.
Do you have any PROPERLY signed document where Nintendo tells you that they will let you use their online service?
Yes, you can still drive it, but on your property? It still drives, it still does its purpose?
Please give me proper legal information to counter my arguments. I've linked proper information before, all with the boundaries of EU. What you hold up right now are US legality. In the EU you can't really wave your rights without agreeing to it with a signed contract.
Stop right there, this isn't the argument if the console is banned or not. It's about the account. It goes from a "service" to a "e-commerce" as soon they sell products. It's not the same thing.
You and I kind of say the samething but in different words I think. I don't think this will unban any consoles, nor am I really intrested in it, it would be intresting however. This really tickles my fansy discussions about this. But the big legality of banning your eshop account is legal under EU. Since it's a shop, and not a online service persay. It's the big difference. The online gaming part sure, they might have the rights there (not sure). But the shop is the big difference.
Has there been any reports of accounts getting banned as well? I have seen people unlink nnids from banned accounts and then use them on other consoles.
It's actually the same in the Netherlands and Belgium where you have the home copy law and so forth
They couldn't reach the eshop the devices atleast. Possibily their accounts still works. Never the less it would be intresting against Steam, Origin etc. as well. Since you buy the games, not rent them.
You made this statement so you have to prove it. Otherwise it is to be considered false.
Maybe I missed it. Could you please give me the link again, where it says that in all the EU you can access an online service even if you are malicious to this service?
I don't know anything about US laws. I'm German.
This is bullshit. I think this is not true for all the EU, but it may be true for your country. Do you need signed contracts for everything? E.g. for buying stuff in a store?
Since when? But ok. Do you have something PROPERLY signed from Nintendo that says you have access to theri online services?
Do these home copy laws mention the use of online services with copied games?
Can you please answer to this : "What if I buy a physical copy of L.A Noire for example ? I need to access the e-shop to download it, I bought the game, even if I'm banned it's my right to play the game I bought."
Yes, but it is not your right to connect to the servers with a modded console.. Get a second switch for legit purchases? Nintendo will just say "theres nothing we can do sorry"
1) Give it a rest, you don't have much on you?
Modified or unmodified, it doesn't matter, it's my right to play the game I bought.
That's the problem, "theres nothing we can do sorry" is not a valid answer.
Look at the part '' you should''. I didn't state that claim as 100 percent fact, I said you should be able to.
That is correct. Nobody can sue you for playing the game you bought, because you have the right. But this topic is about something different. It's about being banned from their online service.
I mean.... You had the right to play it when you had an unmodified console. Get the update from other means?
the right to a private copy is common in the EU. Every EU country has this. It is a common misconception that it gives you a "free-for-all" pass, though.
