Geeze. Why don't you try both and see for yourself?

 

By the time you made this post or by the time it would take someone to search for an answer. You could have used both and found out for yourself. Its not like there is any danger to your system in trying the tools

 

I use panda's. it's much more powerful.

 

Sorry don't mean to be a dick. I'm getting flak for not typing up every scenario possible that a user might encounter when running through my noob guide. I can't list everything. It's supposed to be a noob guide. If you follow the instructions you'll be fine... so I'm a bit salty right now. I apologize.

Anyway, on to your question.

The trainers are more or less just a gui for codes that have been found using other methods. I haven't used either trainer but I've used multiple other trainers for games and what I've learned is that they are all great. The threads that have been created for each trainer outline the features of each.

For twilight princess I use two different trainers and I have some codes of my own that I use too.

Cheating is a whole guide by itself. At it's core it consists of finding values, changing those values, then verifying results.

The trainers automate all this for you. But they usually only consist of the codes that have been discovered by the author or pointed out by users in the thread. This is why some have cheats that others don't. This is also why i recommend trying them all and using them all.

 

And yet you were too lazy to actually try them out yourself and came here for answers lol.

 

Pandas works on the latest patch, i am not sure the other one does. If you want to cheat everything then Panda's is the one for you, If you just want the basics (heath, etc) then the other is fine.

Like others have said you could of just tried both for yourself and made up your own mind (which i think you will still probably do anyway) instead of asking and being shitty to the people who responded. Ok the first response may of been a bit off but the guy has explained why and apologized. Then you acted like exactly the spoilt dick "lazy and entitled kids" that you mentioned.

In future dont be a dick if you dont want people to be a dick to you.

 

PC only I believe.

 

Making it for Android or something would be like double the work which nobody likes to do. It's not worth it since developers obviously use a PC to write the code and there you go, no need to make it for phones since they can just use their PCs for everything. Also Java programs still have to be severely changed to work with Android since it's still so different to PC. As far as I know, I'm the only Java developer for these kind of tools also and not even then it's easily ported. People just need to get a working PC and (Android) phone to get the best out of everything.