Hacking Custom exploit launchers

[Reecey]

just something I've noticed, the exploit gets REALLY unstable if you have 2 html files (I had a one to select if you want non-kernel or kernel related apps which would lead to a new html), and that made it impossible to use it even though my page "design" is non-existant. Now I did modify my page to have some javascript to hide/show the selected apps in a single html and its all fine, pretty interesting behavior imo.

Don't suppose you could please share that html file or the lines you add to it?. I am having similar issue myself. Did you just change something simple in the design .html file, add an extra line to it maybe to help things run smoother?

 

[TotalInsanity4]

What's the difference between expLauncher and expLauncher Lite?

 

[ByteBite]

The only difference is the lack of icons.

 

[fiveighteen]

I did some more testing on launching the standard kernel exploit and it seems like the background and icons can sometimes interfere with the process.

just something I've noticed, the exploit gets REALLY unstable if you have 2 html files.

I noticed this too; was trying something out with multiple html's and images and it would always freeze halfway through loading. I condensed it down to one html and the kernel exploit seems happier, but whichever hack you try loading after that freezes still, so I'm guessing it still doesn't like images

The whole thing was only 24KB with one html and 10 images. I really don't want to bake the images into the background image since I'm going for a modular approach. Hopefully I can figure out how to increase stability and I'll release it here.

EDIT: Also, do you think the re-directing of hacks from the root index.html to a hack's index.html to payload532.html (or whichever version) could be causing some decreased stability? I think it's doable to merge all of the hacks' index.htmls into the root index.html so it just loads directly.

 

[Reecey]

I've ditched the imgs now, its too unstable bordering on really unstable!. When a lot more is being added there no good, they where fine when it was just a few apps.

 

[FIX94]

EDIT: Also, do you think the re-directing of hacks from the root index.html to a hack's index.html to payload532.html (or whichever version) could be causing some decreased stability? I think it's doable to merge all of the hacks' index.htmls into the root index.html so it just loads directly.

I think so, just modified my page to not do that and instead detect the version directly.

 

[MrRean]

Welcome to WebKit guys.

 

[EclipseSin]

Yea. You can name the file gbatemp.html and run it if u want to. It's just hacked html to send a payload (program/hack/etc) and run. The index for the hacks is only to prevent unsupported versions from freezing or crashing I believe. I link my index directly to the payload html without a check in the index. Works roughly 92% of the time for me personally. Gotta leave room for error on guesstimates lol that's my personal experience though. It could easily vary.

 

[fiveighteen]

Here's my newest.

It does the same as FIX94's page and minimizes as many redirects as possible by checking the version first and then jumping straight to the correct payload. It's also only a combined 22.9KB. I haven't had any issues yet.

The only downside is that I had to bake the images into the PNG and then compress it. I've included the editable PNG here for anyone that wants to change the images or add/remove rows. Enjoy.