Capcom doesn't what NintenDOES.

[RevPokemon]

Well you gotta take into consideration that it did surpass the Kickstarter goal... Twice.
Hence why we are having ports of it for almost every console on Earth right now, even toasters.

Yeah it probably will do well for what is basically an indie game but I doubt it will have mainstream popularity although I hope I'm wrong

 

[ShadowOne333]

Yeah it probably will do well for what is basically an indie game but I doubt it will have mainstream popularity although I hope I'm wrong

We'll have to wait and see.

I will certainly get a copy of it once it is released.
But that doesn't redeem Capcom for letting fans down with each release of long-time franchises.

 

[RodrigoDavy]

The megaman part makes me think of how Nintendo is doing new super Mario bros

What Nintendo been doing right with New Super Mario Bros is that they only make one game per console, I think that's why it still sells so well

 

[RevPokemon]

We'll have to wait and see.

I will certainly get a copy of it once it is released.
But that doesn't redeem Capcom for letting fans down with each release of long-time franchises.

Welp let's look at it like this

Mega man hasn't had a really main game since 04

Re has gone way down since 4

Monster hunter is awesome but doesn't do good in the west

They keep making to many sf games

Darkstalkers and power stone are dead

So capcom is screwing us fans pretty hard

 

[ShadowOne333]

Welp let's look at it like this

Mega man hasn't had a really main game since 04

Re has gone way down since 4

Monster hunter is awesome but doesn't do good in the west

They keep making to many sf games

Darkstalkers and power stone are dead

So capcom is screwing us fans pretty hard

To me RE lost its mojo in 5, 4 still held up pretty well and is quite a unique, even though it changed almost everything that we knew as RE.
Though it is still remarkable for introducing so many great features.

RE has been dead to me since the departure of Shinji Mikami from Capcom.
It hasn't been the same without him.
I think Umbrella Chronicles was the last game before he went separate ways from them.
(Silent Hill went down the same road to me, after 4 it went downhill)

Megaman... Well he has been absent for way too long, makes me think that only Nintendo is really interested in keeping him alive.

MH, Darkstalkers and other games like those, I haven't been too fond with.
What's SF?

 

[RevPokemon]

To me RE lost its mojo in 5, 4 still held up pretty well and is quite a unique, even though it changed almost everything that we knew as RE.
Though it is still remarkable for introducing so many great features.

RE has been dead to me since the departure of Shinji Mikami from Capcom.
It hasn't been the same without him.
I think Umbrella Chronicles was the last game before he went separate ways from them.
(Silent Hill went down the same road to me, after 4 it went downhill)

Megaman... Well he has been absent for way too long, makes me think that only Nintendo is really interested in keeping him alive.

MH, Darkstalkers and other games like those, I haven't been too fond with.
What's SF?

i meant re5 and above arent to great. Sf is street fighter.

 

[ShadowOne333]

i meant re5 and above arent to great. Sf is street fighter.

Yeah from RE 5 and above, suckity suck.

Ah Street Fighter, another poor dry cow by now.
SFIV is going the same way as SFII, they will see a lot of versions and editions until another sequel comes out (SFV)

 

[RevPokemon]

Yeah from RE 5 and above, suckity suck.

Ah Street Fighter, another poor dry cow by now.
SFIV is going the same way as SFII, they will see a lot of versions and editions until another sequel comes out (SFV)

Well its like they keep milking the cows that have been milked and not the ones who haven't been milked in years

 

[war2thegrave]

What's BN?
RE has never been FPS as far as I know.
They have all been Third Person Shooters, or as some people call it "Over the Shoulder"
The first 3 (and CV) had something called fixed camera, from 4 and up it was TPS.

I think you are referring to something like what they did with Lost In Nightmares for RE5.
In there you had an option to either play with a Fixed Camera perspective similar to that of the RE Remake, or the normal camera used in the game.

Dead Aim was at least more than half fps.

 

[ShadowOne333]

Dead Aim was at least more than half fps.

But Dead Aim was half third person and half FPS.
It wasn't entirely FPS.
And the Chronicles series were all onrails shooters, never FPS.

The only one I recall that was entirely FPS was Survivor 1.

 

[war2thegrave]

That's quite a leap from "never been" to "not entirely".

If nintendo really cared about "the fans", they would spend their money putting more polish and refinement
into the Zelda game currently in developement or future games rather than wasting it on cheap copout rehashes
that "the fans" have already played multiple times.

Then again, "the fans" seem to be ardently satisifed with whatever Nintendo does, for bad or for worse.

 

[RevPokemon]

Then again, "the fans" seem to be ardently satisifed with whatever Nintendo does, for bad or for worse.

Not really, a lot of them have left for MS and Sony back during the Wii era.

 

[ShadowOne333]

That's quite a leap from "never been" to "not entirely".

If nintendo really cared about "the fans", they would spend their money putting more polish and refinement
into the Zelda game currently in developement or future games rather than wasting it on cheap copout rehashes
that "the fans" have already played multiple times.

Then again, "the fans" seem to be ardently satisifed with whatever Nintendo does, for bad or for worse.

The Majora's Mask release was more fan service than anything.
The fanbase was eagerly demanding a 3D remake of MM ever since the OoT release.

And I highly doubt they are pulling development effort from the Wii U Zelda title just because of the work put into MM.

 

[WiiCube_2013]

What Nintendo been doing right with New Super Mario Bros is that they only make one game per console, I think that's why it still sells so well

You're right.

DS = New Super Mario Bros.
3DS = New Super Mario Bros. 2
Wii = New Super Mario Bros. Wii
Wii U = New Super Mario Bros. U

In essence it's all the same game with some minor improvements/differences here and there.

It's a good thing that Capcom doesn't listen to the Mega Man fanboys because they're stubborn as hell and let's face it, Mega Man's not the cash cow for Capcom to be making a new game about. However, they should consider to sell Mega Man to Nintendo as it always has had that Nintendo-feel to it.

Sega should also sell Sonic to Nintendo because in terms of the best platformer developer, that's Nintendo whether in 2D or 3D. Let's not forget Crash Bandicoot and Spyro these were the two best platforming games of PS1 and now both are pretty much dead thanks to Activision.

By the way, here's a video of Clement talking about Capcom and Mega Man games of which is very informative and to the contrary, Capcom's released way too many Mega Man games so the fans are some ungrateful assholes really. Would they really want Mega Man to turn to Sonic Boom or the unimaginative New Super Mario Bros. games? Maybe, who knows.

​

Edit: You know what? Screw Mega Man games! Give me Power Stone 3 on PS4!

 

[Tiffani]

[citation needed]



Nintendo has made lazy remakes instead of Capcom.

PRAISE BE TO NINTENDO.

I'd rather have brand new games than "remakes" that are about the quality of updated ports.




They do, and it shows that you're wrong. You're being an armchair business consultant. Capcom pays people to analyze demographics, look at public demands, see what will sell. You thought in your mind "I want a RE2/3 remake, ergo everyone wants one!" and made a shitty thread saying "CAPCOM IS SO DUMB MEANWHILE NINTENDO IS BRILLIANT."

Congrats bro.

Wow, you're way off-base here. The Zelda remakes are anything but lazy. Be careful, your bias is showing.
And the remakes/brand new games debate is one independent of this conversation. Remakes don't preclude a company from also making new games. And in sticking with the overall theme of your post, can we get a citation that Capcom pays people to analyze demographics, please? There's no proof of that.
Also, Megaman would likely sell well as a downloadable only game. There's a market there. And RE6 didn't fail because it tried to innovate, it failed because it strayed too far from the path that made it popular, and the story was incredibly dumb. Trying to make the game a straight action shooter wouldn't be what I call innovation.