PSP is portable too, obviously, I think it works with these kinds of games.
I think this is coming down to taste. When the new 3D art-style came-out in the PS2 era, there were no world maps as they were. FF12 did a great job of exploration, with deserts, the sand sea and many different labyrinths and biomes. In DQ8 you were also able to explore an epic world map from the start. But FFX failed miserably.
You keep saying 'so many amazing RPG's' while only naming a handful of obscure games, mostly action RPG's which are a dumbed down version of real RPG's. Radiata Stories vs FF9? ...no chance, FF9 hands-down. Innocent Sin vs P4, are you joking, P4 is terrible, it is like they cut-out all the 'slow and boring' bits for people with a short attention span. Tales of the Abyss or even Tales of Vesperia (abyss never released here) versus Phantasia. No way. Phantasia is so much better, battles are fun in TOV, but nothing else is. Lunar versus Rogue Galaxy, are you kidding me? I really don't think you can name a PS2 game that could defeat something like FF9/7 Lunar series.
FFX or even FF12 versus FF7. No one thinks the former were better games.
The 3D models and perspective of Star Ocean on PS2 bothered me. I have difficulty connecting with the game when it was presented in this way. P4 bothered me alot, it seems so shallow.
I think we have to agree to disagee as I really don't like action rpgs. I am enjoying the Geneforge saga and other old-school PC RPG's too; but will never even think about buying Diablo 3, any mass effects, even tales of Vesperia seems rather nanny-guided and Dumb-Downed, Skyrim sucked for me (dumbed down from Morrowind).
I 'suffered' greatly when they made RPG's more accesible. I understand you liked some of the PS2 rpg's but I really didn't have a much of a good experience with that system.
I seriously only play old-school and Indie atm. Seems new games are full of propaganda and quick/dumb gameplay. I like a slow-pace and and some grind.
I think this is coming down to taste. When the new 3D art-style came-out in the PS2 era, there were no world maps as they were. FF12 did a great job of exploration, with deserts, the sand sea and many different labyrinths and biomes. In DQ8 you were also able to explore an epic world map from the start. But FFX failed miserably.
You keep saying 'so many amazing RPG's' while only naming a handful of obscure games, mostly action RPG's which are a dumbed down version of real RPG's. Radiata Stories vs FF9? ...no chance, FF9 hands-down. Innocent Sin vs P4, are you joking, P4 is terrible, it is like they cut-out all the 'slow and boring' bits for people with a short attention span. Tales of the Abyss or even Tales of Vesperia (abyss never released here) versus Phantasia. No way. Phantasia is so much better, battles are fun in TOV, but nothing else is. Lunar versus Rogue Galaxy, are you kidding me? I really don't think you can name a PS2 game that could defeat something like FF9/7 Lunar series.
FFX or even FF12 versus FF7. No one thinks the former were better games.
The 3D models and perspective of Star Ocean on PS2 bothered me. I have difficulty connecting with the game when it was presented in this way. P4 bothered me alot, it seems so shallow.
I think we have to agree to disagee as I really don't like action rpgs. I am enjoying the Geneforge saga and other old-school PC RPG's too; but will never even think about buying Diablo 3, any mass effects, even tales of Vesperia seems rather nanny-guided and Dumb-Downed, Skyrim sucked for me (dumbed down from Morrowind).
I 'suffered' greatly when they made RPG's more accesible. I understand you liked some of the PS2 rpg's but I really didn't have a much of a good experience with that system.
I seriously only play old-school and Indie atm. Seems new games are full of propaganda and quick/dumb gameplay. I like a slow-pace and and some grind.








