I just googled that XMG hardware, and I noticed it has a 4k screen. Those are really great in gaming laptops, and I recently saw a demo of a 4k Razor brand laptop at a nearby Microsoft store. 4k televisions are one thing, but when you can squeeze that much pixel density into a laptop screen, you can really start to appreciate image crispness.
On the contrary, your Dell is going to have much better battery life because it sports a 92 watt hour battery versus your XMG 60 watt hour battery. This means the difference between it lasting a few hours versus lasting almost the whole day, so depending on how much time you spend away from home, your Dell might be the only option. I picked up an original Microsoft Surface Pro when they were released, and they were extremely lacking in battery life. The advertised 4 or 5 hours really only felt like 3 hours in real world usage. That's just me, though.
The sound card and wifi chipset look great on both systems. I thought I'd check that just in case, since some manufacturers might skimp in those areas.
If it were me, I'd trust Dell with my money rather than other smaller gaming brands (such as Razor, Origin, Eagle, etc). I know I probably have a slightly biased opinion here, but I think Dell being a bigger company means they have more money to spend on engineering. Things like shell design, fan placement, etc are a VERY important aspect for any piece of electronics if you want it to last. (I know people hate specific companies because they bought X product in the past and had a bad experience, but all bias aside, I do think Dell would generally be the best answer in this case, if we're just comparing brands.)
TLDR: go for your longer battery and a (maybe?) more trustworthy manufacturer, or go for your sweet, sweet 4k screen. Both systems look good to me.
. I stand corrected. Am I correct that they are clevo based laptop?
