Hacking 3.65 vs 3.60 Henkaku

  • Thread starter Thread starter Afunnyname4
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 22,502
  • Replies Replies 16

Afunnyname4

Member
Newcomer
Joined
Jan 6, 2018
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Trophies
0
Age
46
XP
175
Country
United States
I was wondering are there any big differences between 3.60 and 3.65 henkaku. This new h-encore exploit only seems compatible with 3.65 and up so I was wondering what exactly am I missing out on if I stay on 3.60
 
What do you mean with that since 3.60 plays nonpdrm just fine or did you mean something else by that ?
3.60 needs to use decrypted maidumps of games that require 3.61 and up.
Whereas 3.65 would be able to use Nonpdrm for games that require up to 3.65. But would still need decrypted maidumps of games that require 3.67 and up.
 
Last edited by 8BitWonder,
What do you need in order to play downloaded PS1 and psp from pkgj? I'm currently on 3.60 henkaku and these games don't show. Will they only show in adrenaline and not as bubbles on the vita?
 
Another difference is that some plugins/homebrew were never ported properly to 3.65:
- VitaCheat (often crashes)
- ds3vita, ds4vita (can't bind new controllers)
- Vitamin 2.0 (MaiDump is however "ported")
 
Last edited by OperationNT,
Previously, some people stayed on 3.60 because of the inability to restore back to 3.65 in case of problems. This is no longer the case so updating is recommended.

That said, 3.65 games can be run on 3.60 anyway as long as they are decrypted using Mai so it's not a huge deal either way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MUDD_BR
Previously, some people stayed on 3.60 because of the inability to restore back to 3.65 in case of problems. This is no longer the case so updating is recommended.
That makes it sound like you can downgrade to 3.60, but I'm sure that's not what you meant?
 
That makes it sound like you can downgrade to 3.60, but I'm sure that's not what you meant?
No. He meant that to get an enso 3.65 firmware, you had to update from 3.60. If you'd re-install the 3.65 firmware you would lose enso and you had no way of reinstalling the hack.
 
No. He meant that to get an enso 3.65 firmware, you had to update from 3.60. If you'd re-install the 3.65 firmware you would lose enso and you had no way of reinstalling the hack.
Thanks, that makes sense. I still wonder if there's any benefit for 3.60->3.65 enso people to do a clean 3.65 install and re-hack, as it always felt like some sort of frankenfirmware.
 
I asked this on Twitter and apparently not aside from making Vitashell easier to install (I never had a problem with this anyway).

I’ll be leaving mine alone.
 
Thanks, that makes sense. I still wonder if there's any benefit for 3.60->3.65 enso people to do a clean 3.65 install and re-hack, as it always felt like some sort of frankenfirmware.
It shouldn't. As far as I understand enso itself is identical on 3.60, the old 3.65 method and the new one. The exploit used by enso was fixed in 3.67 only. The only reason we couldn't install enso on 3.65 before was the lack of an entry point.

An update with enso already installed was the the only way to get the exploit before, now H-encore is that entry point.

Gesendet von meinem Mi A1 mit Tapatalk
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum