Hell yeah!SoulSnatcher said:Hatsu-style posting, eh?
How many posts did he get?luke_c said:Or Prowler style (I remember that day)
Who said I was?War said:That's not really something to be proud of.
And why not? Once you're not intentionally spamming, I don't see a problem.War said:That's not really something to be proud of.
Stupidly vague, if you're not going to explain the number, why give one at all?haflore said:And why not? Once you're not intentionally spamming, I don't see a problem.
Even if spamming is unintentional, it's still a problem.
Arctic said:This isn't the right place to post this...Then you should've hit the report button.Seems like you didn't even read what the OP wrote.QUOTE(Arctic @ Apr 6 2010, 04:02 PM)Arctic said:Whoa, not bad for GIMP!Implying GIMP produces low quality images, when it's low quality users that produce low quality images.QUOTE(Arctic @ Apr 6 2010, 04:03 PM) lol, I want to see those kids get owned!!Not bad at all! 9/10!
Ouch. Although you might not like my posts, I did always read the posts I was replying to. That's why it took me like 6 hours!ThatDudeWithTheFood said:how long did it take you?
A few hours.
QUOTE(BeatriceTheGolden @ Apr 6 2010, 06:06 PM) *snip
Pretty much describes most members but not many do it 100 times in a dayBeatriceTheGolden said:*long string of quotes that take up to much room for me to post a reply*