Homebrew 10.3 menurop in h.m.hax github???

[Yami_Industries]

I was downloading homemenuhax for my brothers O3ds on 9.9 when I noticed "10.3 menurop" in the description and now I'm wondering if homemenuhax would work on my n3ds on 10.3???

 

[CeeDee]

Nope.

 

[Yami_Industries]

Nope.

damn it...

 

[Pikasack]

But what is the 10.3 menurop for?

 

[CeeDee]

But what is the 10.3 menurop for?

To make noobs ask questions on GBATemp.

 

[robot56]

It's basically the code that would be executed if the exploit still worked, which it does not.

 

[dark_samus3]

But what is the 10.3 menurop for?

Quite honestly I don't think menuhax or browserhax are dead in the slightest... Quote from yellows8 github "The Home Menu code changes just added a "if(decompressed_size_from_lzheader > 0x150000){exit};" check after loading a theme, prior to decompression." Notice the word just (yes it's italicised on github) meaning there's a possible workaround... Or, and this is could be the more likely answer, it's for people who can downgrade/refuse the home menu update, since the code does the same thing with just a check to make the hax not work anymore... Meaning once downgrade is possible, just use a CIA manager to downgrade the homemenu to an exploitable version to use menuhax with who knows what yellow8 has in store for us in the future

 

[Deleted-236924]

Quite honestly I don't think menuhax or browserhax are dead in the slightest... Quote from yellows8 github "The Home Menu code changes just added a "if(decompressed_size_from_lzheader > 0x150000){exit};" check after loading a theme, prior to decompression." Notice the word just (yes it's italicised on github) meaning there's a possible workaround... Or, and this is could be the more likely answer, it's for people who can downgrade/refuse the home menu update, since the code does the same thing with just a check to make the hax not work anymore... Meaning once downgrade is possible, just use a CIA manager to downgrade the homemenu to an exploitable version to use menuhax with who knows what yellow8 has in store for us in the future

I'm thinking he italicized "just" just because it was a very simple fix to the exploit. They only added one line of code that does a very simple check and it was enough to fix the vulnerability.

 

[dark_samus3]

I'm thinking he italicized "just" just because it was a very simple fix to the exploit. They only added one line of code that does a very simple check and it was enough to fix the vulnerability.

I did mention another possible reason