Hacking Q: Does Newest Menuhax work with Luma 6.6?

xtheman · Nov 24, 2016

chocoboss said:
SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO many haters here, you can keep menuhax forever if you want to use emunand, no need to fprce ppl to use A9HL

if you for whatever reason want to use an emunand you can use emunand with A9LH. Just don't move emunand when asked and don't turn on autoboot sysnand when told.

How about you get a little educated before spreading bullshit

chocoboss · Nov 24, 2016

I know that you can use a9hl with luma + emunand. Each time someone tell he / she use emunand + menuhax ppl try to convince them to install Luma + a9hl without thinking that some of us doesn't want to risk a brick or are just too lazy ( and doesn't want to spend time doing something like that because 90℅ of time menuhax or ctr are enought ^^ )

The Catboy · Nov 24, 2016

chocoboss said:
SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO many haters here, you can keep menuhax forever if you want to use emunand, no need to fprce ppl to use A9HL

People don't "hate" menuHAX, they see it as out of date and thus are trying to get people to upgrade.
Why are you always trying to keep using out of date tech?

chocoboss said:
I know that you can use a9hl with luma + emunand. Each time someone tell he / she use emunand + menuhax ppl try to convince them to install Luma + a9hl without thinking that some of us doesn't want to risk a brick or are just too lazy ( and doesn't want to spend time doing something like that because 90℅ of time menuhax or ctr are enought ^^ )

You aren't going to brick if you follow the guide.
Seriously, you're paranoia is as out of date as your setup.

Arkansaw · Nov 24, 2016

Menuhax has zero chance of bricking, while A9lh has a non-zero chance of bricking, so menuhax is infinitely better

Telling people that they "aren't going to brick" is just plain dishonest, when you know very well how many times the a9lh installer has been updated over the past month. https://github.com/AuroraWright/SafeA9LHInstaller/releases

This is not the way to get people to serve as guinea pigs

chocoboss · Nov 24, 2016

I remember when ppl was saying OTPless installer was 100% safe while 50% of ppl was bricking

SimplyFedorable · Nov 24, 2016

Arkansaw said:
Menuhax has zero chance of bricking, while A9lh has a non-zero chance of bricking, so menuhax is infinitely better

Telling people that they "aren't going to brick" is just plain dishonest, when you know very well how many times the a9lh installer has been updated over the past month. https://github.com/AuroraWright/SafeA9LHInstaller/releases

This is not the way to get people to serve as guinea pigs

Honestly, it's getting safer everyday, it's a lot more dangerous to downgrade to 9.2 nowadays then to install A9lh. The most dangerous part of the guide was the 2.1 downgrade from 9.2. Now with the crtnand transfer has a near 100% success rate. Plus, when using unofficial software, nothing is 100% safe, including menuhax. And most of the updates to the A9lh installer had to do with the new otpless install method, which is super new. Normally installing A9lh with a 2.1 downgrade is still bassicly a near 100% success rate.

chocoboss said:
I remember when ppl was saying OTPless installer was 100% safe while 50% of ppl was bricking

well, it is a brand new method. Look at the safeA9LHinstaller release page. It has had tons of recent update to prevent rare bricks. And it was fairly stable in the first place, some people installing on 9 devices with no bricks. There is no reason to stay on menuhax at this point, A9lh takes 30 minutes to install. If your to lazy to install it, it's your own risk.