Let me save you the suspense; the Switch 2 won't get hacked

  • Thread starter Thread starter FernandoRocker
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 58,805
  • Replies Replies 369
  • Likes Likes 25
You mean you are claiming that you can't hack it? Why should we trust your words?
Wrong. I'm claiming no one can hack it.

Do not trust my word. Trust SciresM words. He has repeatedly said that there are no kernel bugs. I don't know how many times I have to keep repeating the same.

353614.jpg


353613.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: DigBar
See above.
1784210557372.png

Possible, I would say something bigger is also possible, it is also possible that they didn't.
1784210806669.png

There is another possible. You don't need to pay me for your not able to proof that it is impossible.

You excuse for not trying is roundly rejected.

If you declare that you don't want to try and decide to give up then no need to discuss any more. Don't say it is impossible for you.
 
I'm glad we've resorted to trying to prove impossibilities. If anyone here can prove that hacking the switch 2 is 100% impossible, can you also go prove whether the world was created last Thursday? Or if we're living in a simulation?
 
View attachment 582390
Possible, I would say something bigger is also possible, it is also possible that they didn't.
View attachment 582391
There is another possible. You don't need to pay me for your not able to proof that it is impossible.

You excuse for not trying is roundly rejected.

If you declare that you don't want to try and decide to give up then no need to discuss any more. Don't say it is impossible for you.
Those messages are from 2020. Almost 7 years ago and still nothing (and only getting more secure by each passing year).

How about this extract from 2025?
356857.png
 
Last edited by FernandoRocker,
  • Like
Reactions: DigBar
I'm glad we've resorted to trying to prove impossibilities. If anyone here can prove that hacking the switch 2 is 100% impossible, can you also go prove whether the world was created last Thursday? Or if we're living in a simulation?
i dont understand your argument, Fernando literally posted something as close to proof as we can get rn. its basically Sciresm's words (that are backed up by his credibility) against your cope and wishful thinking
 
Those messages are from 2020. Almost 7 years ago and still nothing (and only getting more secure on each passing year).

How about this extract from 2026?
View attachment 582392
Even if it takes a thousand years it would still not be impossible. You can't argue for impossibility. Just say chances are not high and more people can accept it. I know some people in this thread probably won't. I would.
 
i dont understand your argument, Fernando literally posted something as close to proof as we can get rn. its basically Sciresm's words (that are backed up by his credibility) against your cope and wishful thinking
I actually don't really give a shit if it's hacked or not so it's not cope.

Sure, it's as close to proof as we can get, but not 100% proof. It's like a limit. You can get extremely close as you approach infinity, but you never quite hit it do you? (It's been a while since my calc class. That's how I remember limits working at least)

I have nothing but the utmost respect for SciresM and all his contributions to the scene over the years, and I'm inclined to believe him until proven otherwise, but to take his word and claim it to be 100% infallible is to put him on a pedestal that no human actually belongs on. I think it is foolish to take his word as 100% proof that something is impossible.

And like, do we really think *Nintendo* made the first unhackable console? Nintendo?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TomSwitch
i dont understand your argument, Fernando literally posted something as close to proof as we can get rn. its basically Sciresm's words (that are backed up by his credibility) against your cope and wishful thinking
You just slap him. Close to proof means not proof. You do understand that right? No goal means no goal. No matter how close it came you still go home.
 
Yes, and Nintendo already did that with the Switch 1. It it wasn't for NVIDIA, the Switch 1 would be unhackable.
Flaw in logic, not hacked is not the same as unhackable. Unless you are in MCU you can't go the the alternate universe where the Nvidia bug was not there. After you found one that it didn't get hacked you sill have no proof that it is unhackable.
 
You just slap him. Close to proof means not proof. You do understand that right? No goal means no goal. No matter how close it came you still go home.
well do you have any proof that it is hackable besides "everything can be hacked"? As I said, you guys have been shown the proof yet you refuse to believe it because it clashes with your dumb delusion about a realistic switch 2 hack
 
well do you have any proof that it is hackable besides "everything can be hacked"? As I said, you guys have been shown the proof yet you refuse to believe it because it clashes with your dumb delusion about a realistic switch 2 hack
Who's the one making the argument based on bad logic? You prove the Switch 2 is hackable by hacking it. Proving that the Switch 2 is impossible to hack, however, would probably earn you a Nobel Prize.
 
did you read sciresm's words?? how can u read that and come to the conclusion that its somehow hackable (software wise obviously)
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum