Digital Nintendo-published titles to be cheaper than physical releases going forwards

yoshi.jpg

Starting from May with the release of Yoshi and the Mysterious Book, digital versions of Nintendo-published Switch 2 exclusives are set to be cheaper than their physical counterparts. Yoshi and the Mysterious Book is now set to cost $69.99 for physical copies, with digital buyers saving $10 at $59.99. Though this is new for US audiences, it should be noted that this has been the case since the system launch in the UK, EU, and Japan. For comparison, Mario Kart World retails for £74.99 physically, with the digital version being £66.99. Similarly, the recently released Pokemon Pokopia retails for £66.99 physically, with the digital version being £58.99.

:arrow: Source
 
I really hope that the reason Cuntendo cut manufacturing by a third, recently, is because the Casuals perception of the console is that all the Switch 2 games cost $80 just because they've saw or heard that MK was. That would be amusement of the highest order.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TankedThomas
Yes, that's true. But when games go on 50% discounts 4-6 times per year, you can't say that shop has the same consumer ethos as one where they go on 50% discounts 0-0 times per year.

$70 Sony games gauge streamers, reviewers, and impatient FOMO chasers. I've NEVER paid full price for a Sony game. $70 Nintendo games gauge everyone. The only way to save money is to buy used physical copies.
But it's been shown that most purchases of games on any platform are within the first month or so. Only evergreen titles manage to break that concept, but those are generally few and far in between. Games on sale only apply to a small group of people by comparison because by the time a game goes on sale, the purchase of said games has slowed down tremendously. Physical tends to get the deeper discounts, and sooner, because retailers have limited shelf space and need to clear inventory for the next games.

Good for you on waiting for the sales, but you are part of the minority, not the majority.

Oh, and they just created a $10 incentive to have fewer physical copies in the wild, didn't they. How about that.
This is the spin folks are talking about, trying to change this from positive news to negative news. Beyond the fact that this change is only about to hit US markets when it's been done in other regions long before, this is also ignoring how Macronix is pushing to outsource the production of more cards. If Nintendo was trying to curb people into a digital-only future, they would not have done this.

I really hope that the reason Cuntendo cut manufacturing by a third, recently, is because the Casuals perception of the console is that all the Switch 2 games cost $80 just because they've saw or heard that MK was. That would be amusement of the highest order.
Look at the name of the author, and realize it's the same person that has been making false claims for a long time, including one where Nintendo had to call them out (regarding the 4k Switch). This one in particular is being called out by more reliable folks. The article itself is using old data that isn't even relevant now.

It's unfortunate that folks are falling for this.
 
I know I'm late, but... How is this news? I've seen the usual - 705% off games on a steam Nintendo sale on the switch 2. No, not exactly first pay titles (is that the news?), but eg that rabbids crossover is usually 75% off. I don't see physical stores match those numbers.

Edit: nevermind... It's about Nintendo's own published titles. Misread thread title
 
Last edited by Taleweaver,
But it's been shown that most purchases of games on any platform are within the first month or so.

That's true. I forget sometimes that I'm in a small minority.

However, games on Steam for example are MSRP $60-$70 too when they're big games. You can't honestly say that Steam and the Nintendo eshop are interchangeable in the discussion of pricing. The difference is that when Nintendo makes a change to MSRP, that's a change to what all their games will always cost.

What I'm really pushing back on is the idea that discussing this involves "hating on Nintendo." They're not equivalent practices. There's more distinguishing them than the logo.

If Nintendo was trying to curb people into a digital-only future, they would not have done this.

I didn't say they were trying to achieve a digital-only future. I was saying they're trying to squeeze the used physical market to create artificial value. If physicals go on Nintendo Selects for $19.99, you can't do this crap with the $59.99 "savings" on digital. You can only get away with this by treating customers poorly from the moment a game comes out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: orangy57
However, games on Steam for example are MSRP $60-$70 too when they're big games. You can't honestly say that Steam and the Nintendo eshop are interchangeable in the discussion of pricing. The difference is that when Nintendo makes a change to MSRP, that's a change to what all their games will always cost.
3rd-party games on Steam. Those developers choose the price of their games on Steam just as they do on the eShop.
I didn't say they were trying to achieve a digital-only future. I was saying they're trying to squeeze the used physical market to create artificial value. If physicals go on Nintendo Selects for $19.99, you can't do this crap with the $59.99 "savings" on digital. You can only get away with this by treating customers poorly from the moment a game comes out.
Ah, I see what you mean by copies in the wild. Not sure what you mean with the Selects stuff though when both digital and physical get scaled down.
 
Been the case for uk since launch..Resident Evil Generation Bundle was an extra £10.00 £84.99 on eshop over Amazon uk £74.99 for the physical
 
Been the case for uk since launch..Resident Evil Generation Bundle was an extra £10.00 £84.99 on eshop over Amazon uk £74.99 for the physical
Well, that is 3rd-party who chooses their own prices. This news is specifically about Nintendo's own games in the US, which has already made the separation in other regions with physical being more than digital.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Reecey
They've been cheaper digitally in the UK since the Switch 2 launched.
 
Look at the name of the author, and realize it's the same person that has been making false claims for a long time, including one where Nintendo had to call them out (regarding the 4k Switch). This one in particular is being called out by more reliable folks. The article itself is using old data that isn't even relevant now.

It's unfortunate that folks are falling for this.
I've long accepted that this level of dumbness is a symptom of the low intelligence of your average pirate and anti-Nintendo grifter. Many of them lack even some of the most basic levels of reading comprehension, and trying to get them to see pattern recognition regrading misinformation tailored towards their low intelligence is like trying to give a feral cat a bath.

Better to just point at them, laugh at or mock their foolishness, and move on.
 
I've long accepted that this level of dumbness is a symptom of the low intelligence of your average pirate and anti-Nintendo grifter. Many of them lack even some of the most basic levels of reading comprehension, and trying to get them to see pattern recognition regrading misinformation tailored towards their low intelligence is like trying to give a feral cat a bath.

Better to just point at them, laugh at or mock their foolishness, and move on.
The thing is, that particular author doesn't only target Nintendo. They targeted Sony too.
 
The thing is, that particular author doesn't only target Nintendo. They targeted Sony too.
Personally, I wouldn't be surprised if the author includes Sony purely to present to readers the appearance of not being biased beyond all reason against Nintendo (like a lot of grifters these days). Sony "hate" or misinformation is rarely ever genuine enough for people to keep it going for more than a few days, a week at most. Many genuinely believe that Sony is one of the "good guys" who released their games on PC out of the goodness of their hearts (and not the true purpose of countering losses from poor PS5 console/game sales, at least prior to Valve's Steam Machine becoming a potential threat to Sony's bottom line and future plans).
 
Interesting way to word the title, should be something like "Nintendo is making physical releases more expensive than digital moving forwards"

It's not saving, you're being charged more for the physical copy while they charge the expected sale price for the digital version
 
Interesting way to word the title, should be something like "Nintendo is making physical releases more expensive than digital moving forwards"

It's not saving, you're being fleeced for the physical copy while they charge you the normal price for the digital version
We had confirmation that it isn't that, even to the point of saying that the cost of physical is not changing. Going from $70 to $70 is not making it more expensive. It's making digital cheaper. $60 being the "normal" price for digital hasn't been a thing for years as proven by the other platforms.
 
We had confirmation that it isn't that, even to the point of saying that the cost of physical is not changing. Going from $70 to $70 is not making it more expensive. It's making digital cheaper. $60 being the "normal" price for digital hasn't been a thing for years as proven by the other platforms.
I guess it's just because I didn't see Yoshi and the mysterious book as a 70 dollar game. I thought all the non-flagship S2 games were going for 60. Just noticed that Kirby air riders was 70 dollars DAYUMMM I've been out of the loop. Even mario TENNIS is 70
 
  • Like
Reactions: DiscostewSM
I guess it's just because I didn't see Yoshi and the mysterious book as a 70 dollar game. I thought all the non-flagship S2 games were going for 60. Just noticed that Kirby air riders was 70 dollars DAYUMMM I've been out of the loop. Even mario TENNIS is 70
Well, we found out before this that Yoshi was going for $60 digital, but had no such confirmation of what it would cost physically. The thing is, this wasn't some last-minute decision to make this split change. This was probably planned weeks, if not months in advance. Other regions were already doing the split since launch. Personally, as I noted in this thread already, I think tariffs were the cause of the initial higher digital price, that instead of letting physical take the brunt of it, they chose to do it to digital to balance it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChronosNotashi
Indies sure. Those limited print "boutique" publishers charge more than digital.

They do have sales,even Microsoft and Sony do it. Sega usually puts discounts mere months after a game release.

Nintendo? They keep seven year old games or more at the same prize.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum