Get the fuck out of myShrek is overrated.
When I was a kid, Zelda 64 seemed so cinematic. It helped that the game had a great presentation. The first time you open a large treasure chest was definitely a highlight of the generation. To be honest, I think any framerate would suit that game, provided it doesn't dip below the original 20fps.Ocarina of Time looks best with a locked 20 fps

That's a popular opinion.New Metroid sucks, such a let down for a 18 year wait. Its like a watered down Halo with a Metroid theme.
Just, have set enemy spawns/escape rope from the boss room, and perhaps only allow enemy respawn if you don't beat the boss if you're gonna be inclined to grind(but its always a better game design to AVOID having a mindless grind).I think that more videogames should make so that enemies run away from you after beating the dungeon's boss OR disabling random encounters when you beat the dungeon's boss. the only game that I know does this is earthbound and maybe chrono trigger
Respectfully, I disagree. I liked that line from Chris Redfield in Resident Evil 5- I think it's at the very beginning of the game- where he merely admits to being a realist. Since life is full of variables, the probability of events turning out exactly as hoped (every time) is unreasonable. Unfortunately, the probability of events having a negative result increases, if we're surrounded by negative (ill-willing) people.Its good to be negative all the time, since being negative and being realistic are the same thing and its good to be realistic
No they're not.being negative and being realistic are the same thing
Don't be so negative.No they're not.
It's a double negative, so technically...Don't be so negative.
Without actually bothering to check the definition, I'm gonna say it's not a double negative because one isn't negating the other, only reinforcing it.It's a double negative, so technically...
Ain't no negatives allowed around these parts.It's a double negative, so technically...
Absolutely not a double negative. It would need to be something like "they're not nothing" or similar for it to be a double negative. The phrase would actually mean they're something not nothing as they're both negative words. Much like how in the US people use the phrase "I could care less", ok so care less then. When the actual gramatically correct sentence would be, I couldn't care less.Without actually bothering to check the definition, I'm gonna say it's not a double negative because one isn't negating the other, only reinforcing it.


Yes. It doesn't matter where it is, from malls to the radio to practically anywhere, I still can hear Christmas songs more and more frequently as mid-November passes up to January. I honestly feel bad for the people who can't stand listening to the same thing over-and-over, we need to have regular tunes more frequently regardless of what time it is.In today's world of smartphones, Amazon, etc., do you still run into the infamous Christmas songs as frequently? If not, do they still deserve the same disdain as 30 years ago?


RGB LEDs shouldn't exist on modern computer cases or any accessory for that matter. I like my case plain, non-flashy, and simple-it's both distracting and more of a novelty to impress. Companies who advertise them "for gaming" are out of the trends. I don't think those who enjoy gaming appreciate it unlike those years ago.Laptops should have lights on the screen, not in the keyboard!

I remember working retail in 2012 and grew to loath Christmas music. Listening to that shite should be seen as a cruel and unusual punishment.Yes. It doesn't matter where it is, from malls to the radio to practically anywhere, I still can hear Christmas songs more and more frequently as mid-November passes up to January. I honestly feel bad for the people who can't stand listening to the same thing over-and-over, we need to have regular tunes more frequently regardless of what time it is.