Humans have gender, and I have no idea what this has to do with Roe.
Human gender is tied to their sex, the same doesn't apply to objects.
English isn't even a gendered language so I don't know what the fuss is all about in English-speaking countries.
And even when you get to study gendered languages like Spanish or any other Latin-derived language, you will find out that the gender of objects don't coincide with the gender of humans.
One such example would be the word astronaut, in English the word has no gender, but in Spanish it has Female gender: Astronauta.
However, that gender only applies to the object itself (in this case, the profession), not to humans, if you were to specify a human astronaut, you have to use El/La for male or female, El Astronauta, La Astronauta, because El/La refers to a human, but Astronauta refers to a profession, there is no such thing as an Astronauto.
Some professions do get adjusted to the gender of the person (conductor, conductora), but that only furthers indicate that human gender is strictly based on sex, while objects either have neutral gender, or their gender is tied to the sex of the human involved.
There's may other examples of this in any gendered languages, but English isn't one so it's hard to find them. There wasn't even a he/she in old English, everyone was she. The introduction of a He was due to influence of gendered languages like French and Spanish.