January 6th hearings

[Deleted member 586536]

https://notthebee.com/article/fbi-a...n-video-inciting-people-to-get-this-st-burned

Really? why do you trust this source? What makes it credible, since now you just gave me and everyone a random source no one has heard of. Oh and this doesn't help your case either

Big tech, woke twitter mobs, all in the same sentences screams immediate bias. This is what the far right screams.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/...icted-federal-court-seditious-conspiracy-an-0
If this was true that it was antifa. Why would white supremisist groups were charged
https://www.npr.org/2021/03/02/972564176/antifa-didnt-storm-the-capitol-just-ask-the-rioters

And why would the very rioters say that Antifa wasn't present?
If you want me to believe that, your going to have to explain these inconsistencies.

 

[Creamu]

Really? why do you trust this source? What makes it credible, since now you just gave me and everyone a random source no one has heard of. Oh and this doesn't help your case either
View attachment 314795
Big tech, woke twitter mobs, all in the same sentences screams immediate bias.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/...icted-federal-court-seditious-conspiracy-an-0
If this was true that it was antifa. Why would white supremisist groups were charged
https://www.npr.org/2021/03/02/972564176/antifa-didnt-storm-the-capitol-just-ask-the-rioters

And why would the very rioters say that Antifa wasn't present?

Choose any source you like:
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=januray+6+FBI+agents&t=h_&ia=web

 

[MariArch]

Tip. Just let this entire thread just die. It's pointless. People aren't going to see eye to eye. Youi'd think the right would start to question why while the rest of the world is watching the hearings, Fox continues to air re-runs of Biden falling on his bicycle. But nope. Convincing the Always Trumpers will NEVER happen. Anyone trying is wasting their time.

Convincing Trumpers of what? What are they trying to convince people of? That people going into the capital is bad? I don't think people need convincing of that.

My question to you is, if this isn't all showmanship, why haven't they charged Trump with anything? Because they have nothing. You are so gullible if you don't think this is just some backfiring attempt to tell people "vote for me!". Spoiler alert. all polling shows Democrats are about to lose hard in the house and senate, so they're not convincing anyone despite their best efforts.

 

[Deleted member 586536]

Choose any source you like:
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=januray+6+FBI+agents&t=h_&ia=web

Your literately giving a bias search. your looking up for a conspiracy.
here let me give you a better search request instead
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=januray+6+FBI+agents+true+or+false?&t=h_&ia=web

 

[Deleted member 586536]

My question to you is, if this isn't all showmanship, why haven't they charged Trump with anything? Because they have nothing.

False, they haven't done it primarily because for political tactical reasons. See let's be honest. If they decided to refer DOJ right off the bat, you would immediately argue that this is a witch hunt. So they've decided to let DOJ do their own thing, and wait for them to respond. Which clearly, that worked. However given how suddenly they responded, DOJ likely was already doing it's own thing before the hearings relating to this. They don't communicate with each other at all unless it's a specific request.

 

[Creamu]

Your literately giving a bias search. your looking up for a conspiracy.
here let me give you a better search request instead
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=januray+6+FBI+agents+true+or+false?&t=h_&ia=web

Fortunalty we have the media that informs us about the dealings of the FBI.

 

[MariArch]

False, they haven't done it primarily because for political tactical reasons. See let's be honest. If they decided to refer DOJ right off the bat, you would immediately argue that this is a witch hunt. So they've decided to let DOJ do their own thing, and wait for them to respond. Which clearly, that worked.

Uh huh. Sure thing buddy. DOJ will definitelyyy do something.

they probably have their hands full investigating all the soccer moms at school board meetings

 

[Deleted member 586536]

Uh huh. Sure thing buddy. DOJ will definitelyyy do something.

https://www.npr.org/2022/06/16/1105...wants-to-see-the-jan-6-committees-transcripts
Again, DOJ doesn't just casually announce that it wants transcripts from a hearing. When said hearing is about the former president. That doesn't just happen

 

[MariArch]

https://www.npr.org/2022/06/16/1105...wants-to-see-the-jan-6-committees-transcripts
Again, DOJ doesn't just casually announce that it wants transcripts from a hearing. When said hearing is about the former president. That doesn't just happen

I'm glad to see you're getting your hopes up junior. Will just make it funnier when drumpf ends up back where he was for another 4 year term lol.

 

[Deleted member 586536]

Choose any source you like:

you still have to answer about inconsistencies.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/...icted-federal-court-seditious-conspiracy-an-0
If this was true that it was antifa. Why would white supremisist groups were charged
https://www.npr.org/2021/03/02/972564176/antifa-didnt-storm-the-capitol-just-ask-the-rioters

And why would the very rioters say that Antifa wasn't present?
If you want me to believe that, your going to have to explain these inconsistencies.

 

[Creamu]

you still have to answer about inconsistencies.

This guy is a FBI agent.

 

[Deleted member 586536]

This guy is a FBI agent.

according to the biased source found from a biased search question. Golly, I can't imagine why it gave you a biased answer all related to your conspiratorial question.

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/11/ray...robe-dismisses-claims-of-fbi-involvement.html
“The select committee has interviewed Mr. Epps. Mr. Epps informed us that he was not employed by, working with, or acting at the direction of any law enforcement agency on January 5th or 6th or at any other time, and that he has never been an informant for the FBI or any other law enforcement agency,” the spokesperson said.


https://web.archive.org/web/2022061...ame-entangled-trump-touted-conspiracy-theory/


"In 2011, Epps was listed as president of the Arizona chapter of the Oath Keepers. The Oath Keepers, founded in 2009, is described by the Anti-Defamation League as “a large but loosely organized collection of anti-government extremists who are part of the broader anti-government ‘Patriot’ movement.” Epps was the primary media contact for the group, granting interviews at the time."


"Ryman noted that an image of Epps appeared to be listed on an FBI website seeking the public’s help in identifying people who may have entered the Capitol but that Epps declined to comment on whether he was the man in the photo."

He was being hunted down by the FBI at that time. How can you be "part of the FBI" if the FBI is actively looking for you. That doesn't make any sense

 

[Creamu]

according to the biased source found from a biased search question. Golly, I can't imagine why it gave you a biased answer all related to your conspiratorial question.

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/11/ray...robe-dismisses-claims-of-fbi-involvement.html
“The select committee has interviewed Mr. Epps. Mr. Epps informed us that he was not employed by, working with, or acting at the direction of any law enforcement agency on January 5th or 6th or at any other time, and that he has never been an informant for the FBI or any other law enforcement agency,” the spokesperson said.


https://web.archive.org/web/2022061...ame-entangled-trump-touted-conspiracy-theory/


"In 2011, Epps was listed as president of the Arizona chapter of the Oath Keepers. The Oath Keepers, founded in 2009, is described by the Anti-Defamation League as “a large but loosely organized collection of anti-government extremists who are part of the broader anti-government ‘Patriot’ movement.” Epps was the primary media contact for the group, granting interviews at the time."


"Ryman noted that an image of Epps appeared to be listed on an FBI website seeking the public’s help in identifying people who may have entered the Capitol but that Epps declined to comment on whether he was the man in the photo."

He was being hunted down by the FBI at that time. How can you be "part of the FBI" if the FBI is actively looking for you. That doesn't make any sense

Okay. You watch the TV, hegemonic media oulets, the government and when you have uncovered the truth at the end of the spectacle let me know.

 

[Deleted member 194275]

I did not read the first page, but when did the jan 6th invasion became a antifa invasion? If you are not trolling and really believe in that, then you are drinking a real good mushroom tea.



(can I have some?)

 

[Creamu]

I did not read the first page, but when did the jan 6th invasion became a antifa invasion? If you are not trolling and really believe in that, then you are drinking a real good mushroom tea.



(can I have some?)

There are videos of this guy in the building. He is a known and prolific BLM and Antfia activist. I agree that this sounds very odd. How can that be? : D

 

[Deleted member 194275]

There are videos of this guy in the building. He is a known and prolific BLM and Antfia activist.

there are videos of a vegan shaman guy, so that makes the invasion a vegan invasion?

 

[Creamu]

there are videos of a vegan shaman guy, so that makes the invasion a vegan invasion?

Yes, it seems that vegans are within the cluster of people that were at this event.

 

[alt_Human]

Where's the "You're dumber than rock and your only sources are conspiracy theory sites and memes." emoji?

 

[Creamu]

@lokomelo form this perspective it wouldn't be accurate to call the invasion carnivore, right?

 

[Deleted member 194275]

@lokomelo form this perspective it wouldn't be accurate to call the invasion carnivore, right?

there was no tiger or bears on the video, there was only far right domestically based terrorists.