Creamu comics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Creamu
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 3,975
  • Replies Replies 57
  • Likes Likes 1
20340.jpg
 
It's completely made up. No evidence of its existence is there.
You might want to take a look at this metaregression analysis:

Metaregression analysis indicated that the association was significantly associated with methodological study quality (p < 0.019, 95% CI 0.009-0.09). Relationship between source of funding and log OR for each study was not statistically significant (p < 0.32, 95% CI 0.036-0.010). We found evidence linking mobile phone use and risk of brain tumours especially in long-term users (≥10 years). Studies with higher quality showed a trend towards high risk of brain tumour, while lower quality showed a trend towards lower risk/protection.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28213724/

For more information and discussion I have to direct you here
https://gbatemp.net/group/192/info
since this is the art forum
 
That's all anecdotal evidence. At best it would be considered counting the hits and ignoring the misses. If you want to find the truth of something you would want to use the scientific method. The way you do that is not by trying to find evidence to support your preconceived belief. you do the opposite. you try to disprove it. if you cant disprove it then you turn to your peers to see if they can. That way you get closer and closer to the truth. or, you can stick your fingers in your ears while saying "LAH LAH LAH I CAN'T HEAR YOU!"
You might want to take a look at this metaregression analysis:



https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28213724/

For more information and discussion I have to direct you here
https://gbatemp.net/group/192/info
since this is the art forum
 
That's all anecdotal evidence. At best it would be considered counting the hits and ignoring the misses. If you want to find the truth of something you would want to use the scientific method. The way you do that is not by trying to find evidence to support your preconceived belief. you do the opposite. you try to disprove it. if you cant disprove it then you turn to your peers to see if they can. That way you get closer and closer to the truth. or, you can stick your fingers in your ears while saying "LAH LAH LAH I CAN'T HEAR YOU!"
For more information and discussion I have to direct you here
https://gbatemp.net/group/192/info
since this is the art forum
 
of course. fingers are deeply stuck in your head holes. I'm not going to bother posting in that thread. I have a feeling it would not do any good.

I made a living by creating art my entire adult life. The one thing I learned is that anything can be considered art by it's creator.
 
of course. fingers are deeply stuck in your head holes. I'm not going to bother posting in that thread. I have a feeling it would not do any good.

I made a living by creating art my entire adult life. The one thing I learned is that anything can be considered art by it's creator.
True. Real art has deeper layers of meaning, that's what the main differentiator is between camp and art.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Dark_Ansem
what does "deeper layers of meaning" even mean? That's like saying crystal have power. smells like woo-woo.
 
I need to moderate my threads more stricktly in the future. This thread unfortunatly has been moved to the edge of the forum. I retire as a comic creator.

what does "deeper layers of meaning" even mean? That's like saying crystal have power. smells like woo-woo.
If you have dealt with art before you might have noticed that art is connected to a discourse that spans across historical and cultural lines. Here is an example of a analysis I did. Since this Thread has been moved to the edge of the forum there is no point in stopping further derailment.
https://gbatemp.net/threads/the-matrix-1999-is-thomas-anderson-nemo.612470/
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum