Joe Biden Wins - Becomes 46th president of the United States

[tabzer]

That's why I said "in other words." Whoops, tabzer's meltdown has gotten to the point that he can't read anymore.

So if Eric Garner had covid-19, that means he was another fatality due to that?

 

[Lacius]

So if Eric Garner had covid-19, that means he was another fatality due to that?

If he had COVID-19 and died from it, yeah. lol

 

[tabzer]

If he had COVID-19 and died from it, yeah. lol

But all that's necessary is that it is on his death certificate.

 

[Lacius]

But all that's necessary is that it is on his death certificate.

Yeah, as a cause of death. Lol, are you trying anymore?

 

[tabzer]

Yeah, as a cause of death. Lol, are you trying anymore?

So, if on his death certificate, he died of asthma with covid-19 being connected as a comorbidity, or vice-versa--would you make the argument that a cop didn't kill him?

 

[Lacius]

So, if on his death certificate, he died of asthma with covid-19 being connected as a comorbidity, or vice-versa--would you make the argument that a cop didn't kill him?

Eric Garner would have died with or without COVID-19.

 

[ghjfdtg]

It's almost like i called it when i said in an earlier post people will think the courts are currupt next. The grasping at straws and coping is real high in here.

 

[tabzer]

Eric Garner would have died with or without COVID-19.

That's not the question. But it seems you notice the contradiction.

It's almost like i called it when i said in an earlier post people will think the courts are currupt next. The grasping at straws and coping is real high in here.

Some courts are corrupt. I don't know the status of each case, or if Trump ever intended to win a court case. AFAIK, they aren't even "his cases". I personally can't fathom why Dominion forensic reports haven't hit the floor and why there hasn't been a stronger investigation of Dominion machines as a whole.

 

[Lacius]

That's not the question. But it seems you notice the contradiction.

Eric Garner, hypothetically, would have been killed BY the police officer, with or without COVID-19. I answered your question. I forgot your meltdown started to take away your literacy.

 

[tabzer]

Eric Garner, hypothetically, would have been killed the police officer, with or without COVID-19. I answered your question. I forgot your meltdown started to take away your literacy.

Ironic

 

[Lacius]

Ironic

I don't think you know what irony is.

 

[tabzer]

Eric Garner, hypothetically, would have been killed the police officer

I forgot your meltdown started to take away your literacy.

 

[Lacius]

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

That's fair. We're both illiterate fuckers.

 

[tabzer]

There's also the notion that if Eric Garner does have Covid-19 on his death certificate, be it just or not, that you are including him in your statistic.

 

[Lacius]

There's also the notion that if Eric Garner does have Covid-19 on his death certificate, be it just or not, that you are including him in your statistic.

I don't think anyone is arguing that "unjust" COVID-19 death classifications should count. The problem with your argument is there's no evidence of widespread misclassifications. Coming up with hypothetical misclassifications doesn't demonstrate actual misclassifications.

 

[djpannda]

This ones funny. Trump is going rabid and turning on everyone! lol you guys should really look at Lincoln Project videos some of them are ridiculously funny as it torments Trump
Trump turns on Pence as Lincoln Project ad ‘gets in his head’

 

[tabzer]

I don't think anyone is arguing that "unjust" COVID-19 death classifications should count. The problem with your argument is there's no evidence of widespread misclassifications. Coming up with hypothetical misclassifications doesn't demonstrate actual misclassifications.

I see injustice in America being widespread, and maybe it's my bias, but I think it's an ever-growing trend which its grime eventually creeps into all of gears and spokes that perpetuate it. The question of the breaking point occurring is not, "if" but "when?"

 

[Lacius]

I see injustice in America being widespread, and maybe it's my bias, but I think it's an ever-growing trend which its grime that creeps into all of system that perpetuates it. The question of the breaking point occurring is not, "if" but "when?"

When you see things (election fraud, medical fraud, etc.) when there's no evidence of these things, being biased sounds like a good explanation to me.

To be reasonable, the time to believe something is true is when there's evidence that the thing is true.

 

[tabzer]

What I see is evidence, but it would not be reasonable to expect it to be supported by the system and the people that would suffer from it. It looks like a catch-22.

 

[Lacius]

What I see is evidence, but it would not be reasonable to expect it to be supported by the system and the people that would suffer from it. It looks like a catch-22.

Whether or not something is actually evidence of a claim is objective, not subjective. So far, you've objectively provided no evidence of widespread voter fraud, etc.