Hardware Best file system for external HDD?

SomeGamer

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2014
Messages
6,827
Trophies
1
XP
4,902
Country
Hungary
I got a 2TB external HDD and was wondering which file system and cluster size would be the best for it as I have no plans of reformatting ever. (All the info I found on Google was old and/or conflicting.) Also, would the recommendation change if I threw encryption into the mix? Thanks in advance!
 

Ryccardo

Penguin accelerator
Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2015
Messages
7,675
Trophies
1
Age
28
Location
Imola
XP
6,880
Country
Italy
Also, would the recommendation change if I threw encryption into the mix?
No, full-drive (actually full-partition) encryption is something that's typically handled at a layer between block device (whole disk, sectors, etc) and file system

I got a 2TB external HDD and was wondering which file system and cluster size would be the best for it as I have no plans of reformatting ever.
My opinion is that best should mean easiest to use on a different system.

FAT32 is king by a long way, but file size limitations (and huge block sizes for that partition size) may be objectionable
NTFS is therefore my recommendation: full support on Windows, near-full support on most other major OSes (preinstalled in most consumer Linuxes, an optional install for read/write support on most others and Mac OS)
FAT64/exFAT effectively combines the advantages of the above (after a very rough start), but it's still less popular, and the non-journaled, single-allocation-table-by-default is something I would be wary of (especially if you use write caching to improve performance)
If you are really committed to Mac OS, Linux, BDSs, etc you may choose their native file systems - but cross platform support is considerably worse
 
Last edited by Ryccardo,

SomeGamer

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2014
Messages
6,827
Trophies
1
XP
4,902
Country
Hungary
No, full-drive (actually full-partition) encryption is something that's typically handled at a layer between block device (whole disk, sectors, etc) and file system


My opinion is that best should mean easiest to use on a different system.

FAT32 is king by a long way, but file size limitations (and huge block sizes for that partition size) may be objectionable
NTFS is therefore my recommendation: full support on Windows, near-full support on most other major OSes (preinstalled in most consumer Linuxes, an optional install for read/write support on most others and Mac OS)
FAT64/exFAT effectively combines the advantages of the above (after a very rough start), but it's still less popular, and the non-journaled, single-allocation-table-by-default is something I would be wary of (especially if you use write caching to improve performance)
If you are really committed to Mac OS, Linux, BDSs, etc you may choose their native file systems - but cross platform support is considerably worse
Thanks very much! I'm actually going for full-drive encryption because despite what I've seen that OSes corrupt the drive by initializing unallocated space, Windows was more than happy to format a RAW partition while it didn't even show the drive with (seemingly) unallocated space (only in System Management).

A bit unrelated question, turning on NTFS compression on the drive I get after mounting the partition with VeraCrypt should be safe, right? (AFAIK files get compressed, then that data gets passed to VeraCrypt meaning it doesn't mess with VeraCrypt headers or anything which would make the data unreadable.) Or is it a bad idea entirely because it'd slow to a crawl?
 

migles

All my gbatemp friends are now mods, except for me
Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2013
Messages
8,033
Trophies
0
Location
Earth-chan
XP
5,299
Country
China
what do you use the external drive for?
PC? NTFS default allocation size, cluster doesn't matter in the end...
if you use it with consoles that might not suppot NTFS like wii, ps3, fat32 32k cluster
(most of stuff for the wii is compatible with NTFS, but not all)
 
  • Like
Reactions: SomeGamer

SomeGamer

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2014
Messages
6,827
Trophies
1
XP
4,902
Country
Hungary
what do you use the external drive for?
PC? NTFS default allocation size, cluster doesn't matter in the end...
if you use it with consoles that might not suppot NTFS like wii, ps3, fat32 32k cluster
(most of stuff for the wii is compatible with NTFS, but not all)
Already formatted as you said, but thanks for your answer! Now deciding on whether to enable NTFS compression.
 

Seriel

Doing her best
Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2015
Messages
3,297
Trophies
3
Age
24
Location
UK
XP
5,944
Country
United Kingdom
Already formatted as you said, but thanks for your answer! Now deciding on whether to enable NTFS compression.
If the goal is to decrease storage space then this will work at the cost of performance, even more so if the files are the type that have lots of repeated bytes.
However I don't recommend turning it on for the whole drive, if you need it for some folders or files you can just enable it in Properties.
4003-Steam_93f30.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: SomeGamer

SomeGamer

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2014
Messages
6,827
Trophies
1
XP
4,902
Country
Hungary
If the goal is to decrease storage space then this will work at the cost of performance, even more so if the files are the type that have lots of repeated bytes.
However I don't recommend turning it on for the whole drive, if you need it for some folders or files you can just enable it in Properties.
4003-Steam_93f30.png
Thanks! So even by today's standards, NTFS compression still comes with a noticeable speed decrease?
 

Ryccardo

Penguin accelerator
Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2015
Messages
7,675
Trophies
1
Age
28
Location
Imola
XP
6,880
Country
Italy
Thanks! So even by today's standards, NTFS compression still comes with a noticeable speed decrease?
NTFS compression is actually very lightweight (remember, it has to be backwards compatible with all Microsoft OSes supporting NTFS)
It's probably not that significant in real world use (especially on a mechanical drive), but it's still useless or counterproductive on already compressed files
 
  • Like
Reactions: SomeGamer

SomeGamer

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2014
Messages
6,827
Trophies
1
XP
4,902
Country
Hungary
NTFS compression is actually very lightweight (remember, it has to be backwards compatible with all Microsoft OSes supporting NTFS)
It's probably not that significant in real world use (especially on a mechanical drive), but it's still useless or counterproductive on already compressed files
Most of them aren't compressed, I try to compress the bigger ones now though.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2: Did you pee in the water