Or at the very least "HeapHax?"@ivoyko, just a suggestion: from now on, don't name threads like this 'HeapHax', instead name it 'HeapHax Question' or something along those lines.
Or at the very least "HeapHax?"@ivoyko, just a suggestion: from now on, don't name threads like this 'HeapHax', instead name it 'HeapHax Question' or something along those lines.
it was mostly fixed in 11.0; don't think it can be used to takeover ns anymore. so that's that.Maybe @smealum will come along and fill us in a little more. Maybe add a wee hint or three
what's the status on heaphax so far??
Btw @smealum, how was it fixed?it was mostly fixed in 11.0; don't think it can be used to takeover ns anymore. so that's that.
<snip> It's still usable, just keep on developing it and ignore other people begging for it.it was mostly fixed in 11.0; don't think it can be used to takeover ns anymore. so that's that.
Dude, it's been patched, developing it is just going to be a waste of time.<snip> It's still usable, just keep on developing it and ignore other people begging for it.
We could tryDude, it's been patched, developing it is just going to be a waste of time.
Sent from my iPhone 4S using Tapatalk