Milk is bad for you

[LittleFlame]

btw @Hells Malice

 

[Aurora Wright]

Thanks for telling me stuff about lactase that I already knew, I guess?
What is your point with this post?

That saying "people who can't digest lactose exist, so everyone has better stop drinking milk" is a non-sequitur.
And besides, milk where lactose is already pre-"digested" into other sugars (lactose-free milk) exists.

 

[CheeseCake]

Give me scientific studies please.
AGAIN
DIETARY ESTROGEN =/= SERUM ESTROGEN

'There was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of changes in serum estrone concentrations,'

Study:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11303585

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------



Yeah because the scientfic studies backing up everything I say are so wrong...

Like I said above, studies don't really mean shit at all. They are only meant to study the physiological effects of substances on the human body.

By the way, your article mentions the word "association". Association = Correlation. "Correlation does not equal causation"

Unless you give me several direct peer-reviewed articles pointing to one conclusion instead of the jumbled mess you're flinging, I cannot be convinced you are correct.

Basically I'm telling you to actually read the shit you're linking

 

[LittleFlame]

I'm not gonna pretend to know science stuff so i'm gonna leave that to the actual smart people i DO know that i'm enjoying watching you get owned in debate

 

[Foxi4]

Guys, you know what this reminds me of? The guy who came to the EoF a few years back talking about expanding conciousness with weed (and no other drugs because drugs are bad and weed is just a plant) then left for a year and came back to advertise how great LSD is.

Look dude, it's been fun, I know we were hard on you, but we're just messin'. You can believe what you want to believe, but don't shove it down people's throats - milk is most definitely not the poison you're trying to make it sound like. As a vegan you're affected by confirmation bias, that's fine. Being vegan or vegetarian comes down to a moral choice - that's it. You don't have to present a bunch of mock science, we're literally mammals, milk is sort of our thing. Yes, some people are lactose intolerant, but that's a matter of gene expression and pre-existing conditions. Milk is still a super-food and those who are not lactose intolerant can drink it just fine. Sorry if you feel offended, your claim just seemed asinine enough to roll with for a while, but I'm leveling with you now - your evidence didn't convince anyone and "cow rape" as an idea is really subjective. I, for one, don't care one bit about it - you can't change that, I'm just stone cold like that. Cheers!

 

[LittleFlame]

This reminds me of a monkey in a labcoat flinging his shit at people but still pretending to be educated

 

[VinsCool]

This guy reminds me of funnystory.

 

[Ssssuper]

Like I said above, studies don't really mean shit at all. They are only meant to study the physiological effects of substances on the human body.

By the way, your article mentions the word "association". Association = Correlation. "Correlation does not equal causation"

Unless you give me several direct peer-reviewed articles pointing to one conclusion instead of the jumbled mess you're flinging, I cannot be convinced you are correct.

Basically I'm telling you to actually read the shit you're linking

This proves that you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.
Every scientific article coming out gets peer reviewed.
I've learned this stuff at a university so I know for a fact that you have no idea wtf you are saying

 

[LittleFlame]

this guy reminds me of one of those things Kyouma from Steins;Gate'd come up with

 

[Deleted User]

This guy reminds me of funnystory.

funnystory's long lost twin

this guy reminds me of one of those things Kyouma from Steins;Gate'd come up with

EVEN BETTER

 

[LittleFlame]

This proves that you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.
Every scientific article coming out gets peer reviewed.
I've learned this stuff at a university so I know for a fact that you have no idea wtf you are saying

did they also learn you how to read properly? that's a skill that seems lost on you

 

[Ssssuper]

This reminds me of a monkey in a labcoat flinging his shit at people but still pretending to be educated

You are a 16 year old kid. Please come back when you are educated.

 

[sarkwalvein]

I will try to make the most direct to the point comment on this thread:
/thread

 

[LittleFlame]

You are a 16 year old kid. Please come back when you are educated.

oh look the highly original calling people kid out of insecurity
EDIT: also kinda sad how the "Kid" is at least by this display smarter

 

[Aurora Wright]

I don't know if google translate does it justice, but there's a pretty good Italian article (from the Italian edition of Scientific American) on lactase and lactase intolerance: https://translate.google.com/transl.../11/22/darwin-e-linnaturalita-del-bere-latte/

 

[CheeseCake]

This proves that you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.
Every scientific article coming out gets peer reviewed.
I've learned this stuff at a university so I know for a fact that you have no idea wtf you are saying

Were you a science major? If not, your opinion is invalid, absolutely.

Here's my way of thinking
Science itself is a like muddled pot of water, you're trying to find out what's in it and how it works.
You can take many paths on understanding it.
"Hypothesis" and "Theories" can be modified, revised, or just dumped into the trash when evidence leads to a conclusion that extremely differs from what you predicted.
The scientific method literally states this
Theories are hypothesis that has a sufficient body of evidence that supports it but they always have exceptions

Nothing is really absolute. A fact is something that is 100% correct, ofc opinions are....yea.

EDit: Btw if you ever took a biology or chemistry class. You were probably introduced to several Theories.
Well I want to tell you quite of a few of those are outdated, basically they got replaced with a newer model because they were wrong

 

[LittleFlame]

You are a 16 year old kid. Please come back when you are educated.

oh! i almost forgot

I'm not gonna pretend to know science stuff so i'm gonna leave that to the actual smart people i DO know that i'm enjoying watching you get owned in debate

 

[Ssssuper]

I don't know if google translate does it justice, but there's a pretty good Italian article (from the Italian edition of Scientific American) on lactase and lactase intolerance: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=it&sl=it&tl=en&u=http://bressanini-lescienze.blogautore.espresso.repubblica.it/2012/11/22/darwin-e-linnaturalita-del-bere-latte/

There are good english articles about lactose intolerance, your point is....?

oh look the highly original calling people kid out of insecurity
EDIT: also kinda sad how the "Kid" is at least by this display smarter

You know nothing about science but still think you can just say that I'm wrong, please study some basic science and physiology and educate yourself.

 

[LittleFlame]

There are good english articles about lactose intolerance, your point is....?



You know nothing about science but still think you can just say that I'm wrong, please study some basic science and physiology and educate yourself.

actually i think everybody here agrees on the front that you are highly incorrect
"Please educate yourself" on that simple fact
besides why bring a thread about HOW MILK IS BAD FOR YOU on a gaming forum isn't that for a health forum?

 

[Aurora Wright]

There are good english articles about lactose intolerance, your point is....?



You know nothing about science but still think you can just say that I'm wrong, please study some basic science and physiology and educate yourself.

I've just explained it to you a couple posts prior. And that article wasn't directly directed to you, I just posted it for whoever is interested.

That saying "people who can't digest lactose exist, so everyone has better stop drinking milk" is a non-sequitur.
And besides, milk where lactose is already pre-"digested" into other sugars (lactose-free milk) exists.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur_(logic)