Well it is obvious that the Vita is stronger than an Old 3DS, but what about a New 3DS?
Asking this to see which device I should use for emulation (NOT to start a console war).
Vita:
1. severely underclocked Cortex A9 CPU*
2. Default clock speed: 333mhz. Max clock speed: 444mhz
3. Quad core
4. Higher resolution meaning more pixels the CPU has to process.
*an A9 was designed to be clocked at 2ghz.
New 3DS:
1. ARM11 (not sure if underclocked or not) with ARM9 (only used for DS games?)
2. Default clock speed: 268mhz. Max clock speed: 804 mhz
3. Quad core
4. Lower resolution, less pixels to process.
The Vita specs looks lower, but I heard people saying that clock speed isn't everything. Plus I am not adding in both system's GPU and RAM.
Asking this to see which device I should use for emulation (NOT to start a console war).
Vita:
1. severely underclocked Cortex A9 CPU*
2. Default clock speed: 333mhz. Max clock speed: 444mhz
3. Quad core
4. Higher resolution meaning more pixels the CPU has to process.
*an A9 was designed to be clocked at 2ghz.
New 3DS:
1. ARM11 (not sure if underclocked or not) with ARM9 (only used for DS games?)
2. Default clock speed: 268mhz. Max clock speed: 804 mhz
3. Quad core
4. Lower resolution, less pixels to process.
The Vita specs looks lower, but I heard people saying that clock speed isn't everything. Plus I am not adding in both system's GPU and RAM.
Last edited by TheCasketMan,