Hacking Gateway 3DS working on the New Nintendo 3DS.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vengenceonu
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 3,494,606
  • Replies Replies 24,879
  • Likes Likes 30
Status
Not open for further replies.
"i hope", " it will be" guys you are so funny, every single click on gateway site = $... Now you know why they not released yet?

You don't get money for getting your site clicked on. Besides, we hit F5 instead of clicking every time.
And why does everyone think GW will skip 2.8 and 2.9 for 3.0?
 
You don't get money for getting your site clicked on. Besides, we hit F5 instead of clicking every time.
And why does everyone think GW will skip 2.8 and 2.9 for 3.0?

You do get money for every time a site is reloaded or "clicked on" if ads are present.
 
You don't get money for getting your site clicked on. Besides, we hit F5 instead of clicking every time.
And why does everyone think GW will skip 2.8 and 2.9 for 3.0?

major updates usually jump to the next whole number, like when they jumped to 2.0 for emunand

also, hasn't gaben talked about hl3 being in development for like 20 years now?

You do get money for every time a site is reloaded or "clicked on" if ads are present.
not usually, not anymore at least, 99.9999% of ads are click-through, and 99.999% of those are click then make a purchase.

my stats are inaccurate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wilhelm
You do get money for every time a site is reloaded or "clicked on" if ads are present.

GW's page doesn't have ads.
major updates usually jump to the next whole number, like when they jumped to 2.0 for emunand

also, hasn't gaben talked about hl3 being in development for like 20 years now?

Half Life 1 is 17 years old.
 
I don't think gateway are chinese because they said this about the clones "with cheap Chinese design and components." they are talking like chinese stuff is inferior to their product
 
  • Like
Reactions: DSlite2
You don't get money for getting your site clicked on. Besides, we hit F5 instead of clicking every time.
And why does everyone think GW will skip 2.8 and 2.9 for 3.0?

ya know that next update number after 2.9 is 2.10 right? ofc if it' s not a major update.
 
So, who is ordering Chinese food over the holidays? (They are about the only restraunts open in the US)
 
2.9 represents 2.90, not 2.09

mmmm, with version numbers I think it makes more sense for 2.9 to represent 2.09.
That way, you can make a minor update (but not a tiny one) after 2.9 and have somewhere to go that isn't 3.0.
going 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, 2.10 seems better than going 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, 2.91 or 2.95.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dplaktos
Status
Not open for further replies.

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum