Where were you for the last 4 years? Neither of them should be allowed into office. >.Obama. I saw personally how bad Mitt really is.
Obama is still not as bad as Mitt. I was born and raised in Massachusetts and saw just how fast we lost all our jobs.Where were you for the last 4 years? Neither of them should be allowed into office. >.<Obama. I saw personally how bad Mitt really is.
Agreed, but Obama is still pretty bad. Both are going to destroy the USA if given the slightest chance. It's a lose lose situation.Obama is still not as bad as Mitt. I was born and raised in Massachusetts and saw just how fast we lost all our jobs.Where were you for the last 4 years? Neither of them should be allowed into office. >.<Obama. I saw personally how bad Mitt really is.
If Mitt plans on doing what he did to Massachusetts, then there is no hope for America.
No, but the class interests they serve are quite obvious, even if they aren't simple. The Democrats and Republicans are essentially two sides of the same coin: That is, they both lie in the pocketbook of the rich and powerful. Obama has basically continued most or all of Bush's policies, and has even intensified them to boot. He also has not carried out a single one of his election promises--the failed closing of Guantanamo Bay and the Wall Street bailout being the tip of the iceberg. There is no basis for thinking that Obama will carry out a qualitatively different policy than Romney. The process of social degeneration (that is, the gutting of social programs and living and working conditions) may appear more benign or act slower under a Democratic presidency, but it won't end up much different than what Romney has in store. When placed alongside his actual political record, Obama's positive and personal qualities, whatever they may be, appear largely irrelevant. In the end, it is only workers and youth--the majority of the American populace--who will suffer in the end.I'm not getting into no political opinions.Everytime I look at Romney I think: 'this guy will wage war against the whole world, and lose'
He's way too outrageous.
You do realize that Obama massively escalated troop levels in Afghanistan and is selectively killing all over the place in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, and who knows where else with frequent unmanned drone strikes, right?? Almost 300 drone strikes in Pakistan alone under Obama, over 5 times more than Bush. Plenty of war going on already and you're worried about the other guy because of a feeling you get when you look at him?? Okay.
All I said is what I see Romswhatever doing. For all we know, he could triple all the numbers you just stated.
Politics and Leaders isn't as plain and simple as people think.
Neither of those things you mentioned will work. I'm all for a socialized healthcare plan, but Obamacare is bastardized and inefficient (I'd prefer something like what the Canadians or the British have). The stimulus is also a placebo that doesn't work well either.Obama actually knows what he's doing. The Republican ads are calling him out for the stimulus and Obamacare, but those are great things, and they either worked or will work.
Obama actually knows what he's doing. The Republican ads are calling him out for the stimulus and Obamacare, but those are great things, and they either worked or will work.
Do you guys really want an Illuminati puppet ruling us?
lol are you talking about this? i haven't slept so i can't think wellDo you guys really want an Illuminati puppet ruling us?
Punch as opposed to Judy?
lol are you talking about this? i haven't slept so i can't think well
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punch_and_Judy
Do you guys really want an Illuminati puppet ruling us?
You have that a little backwards. The states tally up votes separate from other states, and the majority vote in the state decides which party the Electoral College votes go to. The number of EC votes depends on the state's population, so you were probably thinking of the fact that a few states basically control the election.You wouldn't get me out to the polls this year if you paid me. Don't citizen votes not matter anyways during presidential elections? Its all up to state electoral reps IIRC.
No, the electoral college has total control over the votes. They can vote however they want regardless of state votes. Not that they necessarily do that sort of thing all the time, but it happens.You have that a little backwards. The states tally up votes separate from other states, and the majority vote in the state decides which party the Electoral College votes go to. The number of EC votes depends on the state's population, so you were probably thinking of the fact that a few states basically control the election.You wouldn't get me out to the polls this year if you paid me. Don't citizen votes not matter anyways during presidential elections? Its all up to state electoral reps IIRC.